Captured Libyan could shed light on Benghazi
The capture and opportunity for interrogation of accused Benghazi assassin Ahmed Abu Khattala have gone smoothly so far and are a credit to American authorities.
What happened in Benghazi, Libya, the night of Sept. 11, 2012, which included the deaths of U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three of his colleagues, has been engulfed in the fog of Washington politics and a strange war that continues in that country.
A suspected architect of the attack was Abu Khattala. Regardless of the absence of a Libyan government, American security officials have been determined since to bring the attackers to justice.
There is room for complaint it has taken so long, but the capture of Khattala was carried out smoothly by U.S. special forces, with no loss of life by Americans or Libyans.
The government’s intent is to try him in civilian court, appropriately, rather than cart him off to the U.S. Naval Station at Guantanamo Bay, and add him to the 149 prisoners still being detained there for years without trial.
Beyond ascertaining Khattala’s role and obtaining justice, the United States could learn from his interrogation information that might offer clarity on what occurred that fatal night.
“Benghazi” — now an issue in American politics — would definitely benefit from the application of a solid coat of facts. Khattala might be able to offer them.
— Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.