Congress snubs workers on the minimum wage
Labor Day is set aside to honor the toil and skill of the American worker. More than a parade, more than a picnic, if there’s one thing many American workers want today it’s a raise.
CEOs and even average employees of profitable companies receive regular raises, as sure as January follows December.
But higher pay is not in the cards for the 3.3 million U.S. workers who are paid the minimum wage.
The $7.25-an-hour pay rate has not changed since 2009. To have the same buying power, the wage should have grown to $8.05 by now.
If the minimum had been adjusted for inflation during the past four decades, it would be more than $10 an hour today.
That’s one reason Senate Democrats and President Barack Obama were pushing legislation several months ago to raise the minimum wage over two years to $10.10 an hour, then index it to inflation.
But Republicans blocked consideration of the plan and now the proposal appears to be dead.
That’s a shame for workers who make minimum wage, half of whom are between the ages of 25 and 65, and an embarrassment for the United States, which stacks up poorly in a minimum wage comparison with other developed nations.
Using 2012 data, the Paris-based Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development showed that the U.S. minimum wage ranked 26th out of 27 countries when measured as a percentage of the average wage in each country.
Australia, Canada and Great Britain were among those that ranked ahead of the United States, as did Japan, South Korea, Poland and Slovakia. Only Mexico’s wage was worse.
This indignity could be corrected merely by passing a bill to increase the minimum wage.
Improving the lot of other Americans — those who have lost family-sustaining manufacturing jobs to foreign competition, for instance — will require greater efforts, such as a revamped trade policy.
For now, though, Congress can best honor the minimum-wage worker with a simple raise.
— From the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.