Data release welcomed
Federal officials released a huge trove of data Wednesday that shows what Medicare paid to more than 880,000 doctors and other health care providers nationwide. There were some eye-popping stats:
• About 2 percent of doctors collected about a quarter of the $77 billion in payments in 2012.
• An ophthalmologist in West Palm Beach, Fla., topped the list by raking in more than $26 million to treat fewer than 900 patients. That is 61 times the average Medicare payout of $430,000 for an ophthalmologist.
• A Florida cardiologist earned $23 million in Medicare payments, nearly 80 times the average for that specialty.
Those numbers no doubt shocked a lot of Americans. It was news to them. It was not news to Medicare officials, though. They’ve had this information all along.
Medicare, which spends more than $500 billion a year, faces an uncertain future. It desperately needs to be more efficient. The data released Wednesday suggest this system has a long way to go to control its costs.
Now, high Medicare payments to particular doctors or institutions are not by definition signs of waste or fraud. Some doctors justifiably earn more because they’re trained in certain specialties. Some treat patients who require more constant care.
Americans want their doctors to be good. They also want Medicare to survive but that’s going to require a far more efficient system.
The release of this data is an important step toward that goal. For the first time, Americans can see what individual doctors charged, and what Medicare paid, for thousands of services and procedures. That means doctors who bill Medicare for performing more procedures than reasonably could be accomplished in a day face greater odds that they’ll be questioned. The same goes for doctors who overtreat patients by ordering extraordinary numbers of tests, or who treat a suspiciously high number of patients diagnosed with extremely rare conditions.
The American Medical Association has fiercely fought this kind of information disclosure, arguing it’s an invasion of physicians’ privacy. (The information does not reveal any details about patients.) Last year, thankfully, a federal judge cleared the way for the release of the information released Wednesday.
The AMA warned in a statement “releasing the data without context will likely lead to inaccuracies, misinterpretations, false conclusions and other unintended consequences.” AMA officials fear doctors will come under unreasonable suspicion because they’ve reaped large payments during a year. That such information could “mislead the public into making inappropriate and potentially harmful treatment decisions.”
How about if we trust patients and taxpayers to digest this information, debate this information, listen to people put it in context … and make their own conclusions?
We have long backed efforts by government and advocacy organizations to give Americans better access to information on doctors and hospitals. ...
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services posts some hospital quality measures, including readmission rates and other measures, at hospitalcompare.hhs.gov.
Several clinical quality measures for doctors are available at medicare.gov/physiciancompare.
Medicare officials said at a news conference Wednesday they hope outside researchers and organizations will put this newly released information and other data into user-friendly websites to help consumers search for the best care, and to help pinpoint waste and fraud.
This nation received some valuable new information Wednesday. Let’s make good use of it.
— Chicago Tribune
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.