Help for mentally ill
With sharp partisan divisions in Washington and the midterm elections less than six months away, we have no illusions about the prospects for bipartisan cooperation. That said, if any proposal can bring both sides together before November it should be a bill reforming treatment of the mentally ill being advanced by Republican Rep. Tim Murphy of Pennsylvania.
In the aftermath of the many mass shootings we’ve seen in recent years — the Arizona assault that injured Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords; the rampage that left 12 dead in an Aurora, Colo. movie theater; the horrific attack in Newtown, Conn. — the reflexive response from many lawmakers has been to pursue new gun control laws. We’ve long opposed such measures, arguing that any remedy ought to be tailored toward the narrow segment of the population that abuses firearms, not the majority that uses them responsibly. One does not have to share that belief, however, to recognize that the ultimate cause of each of these incidents was the mental illness of the perpetrators.
Representative Murphy, himself a psychologist, is offering up his legislation partially as a corrective for the deinstitutionalization movement of the past several decades, which made it harder to force the mentally ill into treatment against their will. The impulse behind that effort was a noble one. Much of the public was rightly repulsed at the conditions that used to prevail in asylums and justifiably sought more humane treatment for the afflicted. Unfortunately, the effort ended up overcorrecting for the underlying problem. When the mentally ill were left largely to fend for themselves, too many of them ended up in jail or on the streets.
Murphy’s effort would push states toward creating mental health courts that could compel treatment for individuals with a history of violent or criminal behavior. It would rationalize privacy laws to give family members and caregivers more information on the individuals’ condition. And it would restructure Medicaid to better provide for long-term hospitalization for those with severe mental illnesses.
Murphy has already attracted significant bipartisan support for this legislation, but recently hit a speed bump in the form of a rival bill pushed by the Democratic leadership. Unfortunately, that piece of legislation continues the status quo, failing to embrace any substantive reforms and simply throwing more money at the existing system instead. It seems to exist primarily for the purpose of denying Republicans a bipartisan accomplishment.
That gambit is likely short-sighted. With an anti-incumbency mood sweeping the nation, a rare instance of bipartisan cooperation would likely be politically advantageous for both sides. There is, however, an even better argument for passing Murphy’s bill: it’s the right thing to do.
— From the Orange County Register
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.