Medals for drone pilots make sense
Lethal flying robots hover in the skies above Afghanistan. Controlled by pilots far from the battlefield and safe from harm, these drones conduct surveillance, protect U.S. troops and, often, kill enemy combatants.
If these pilots sat in a cockpit rather than in front of a computer screen, they’d be praised as heroes and pinned with medals. They don’t, and they aren’t. Yet, as drones become more routine and more indispensable to the U.S. war effort, the Defense Department is reviewing its procedures for bestowing medals and awards. Should drone pilots be honored with one of their own?
The question is more than philosophical — and the answer is yes.
One reason is that it’s proving extremely hard to attract qualified drone operators. That’s partly because the job lacks esteem within the military and in the public mind. And it’s partly because the career prospects for drone pilots are limited. In the Air Force, their rate of promotion to the rank of major was 13 percentage points below that of traditional pilots from 2008-13. Awards and medals are an important component in determining promotions; giving them to drone operators for extraordinary achievements in combat could help attract better recruits to an increasingly important part of the U.S. arsenal.
Another reason is the military needs to create a moral framework to govern the use of drones and other forms of robotic or automated weaponry. A good first step would be articulating what values will be honored in such warfare, and what virtues a good drone pilot should demonstrate. That might require a substantial shift in thinking ... but it would acknowledge the changing realities of warfare.
That, in turn, could help the public understand drones aren’t — and shouldn’t be — just killing machines: They provide invaluable intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, helping ground troops understand the battlefield and shaping strategic decision-making. They’ve saved a lot of lives.
Finally, drone pilots might be safe from enemy fire, but they aren’t immune to the effects of war. Unlike most pilots, they often see enemies — and casualties — up close. They might monitor targets for months, watching them interact with family and friends, before pulling the trigger. And they have to bear the guilt and consequences when civilians are killed. Drone pilots suffer from mental-health problems ... at the same rate as traditional pilots. And they report very high rates of fatigue and stress. ...
Last year, then-Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced a new honor, known as the Distinguished Warfare Medal, to recognize the work of drone pilots, cyberwarriors and others far from the battlefield. It was the right gesture, poorly executed: The medal would have outranked others, such as the Bronze Star and the Purple Heart, reserved for heroic actions in combat. After criticism, the plan was dropped.
Now, the Pentagon is beginning a review of all military awards and medals ... It should make room for a new medal, or a new ribbon added to an existing medal, to commend drone pilots.
The honor shouldn’t outrank those earned by troops risking their lives. But it should recognize the skills of drone pilots contribute more and more to American success in warfare. It should acknowledge their sacrifice — though not the same as an infantryman’s — is nonetheless honorable. And it should affirm ... the military’s enduring values will evolve as well.
— Bloomberg View
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.