Reform, don’t unionize, major college sports
In a dispute between the National Labor Relations Board and the NCAA, we’re tempted to adopt Henry Kissinger’s position on the Iran-Iraq War: It’s a shame that both sides can’t lose.
The NLRB, particularly during the Obama administration, has dropped any pretense of impartiality, often functioning as little more than the government arm of the union movement. For proof, one need look no further than the board’s ludicrous persecution of Boeing for opening a new plant in right-to-work South Carolina instead of union-friendly Washington State (a case that eventually became too ridiculous to sustain).
As for the NCAA, it stands as an object lesson in the pathology of monopolies, inconsistently enforcing its own rules, riddled with conflicts of interest and generally seeming far more interested in making money from college sports than defending the participants.
No amount of NCAA mismanagement, however, can justify the decision from NLRB Regional Director Peter Sung Ohr more than a week ago, when he declared that college football players at Illinois’s Northwestern University were “employees” under the law and thus eligible to unionize. Mr. Ohr’s opinion turns on a novel interpretation of the law, reasoning that because players on scholarship receive “money” (it seems to make no difference to Mr. Ohr that this is functionally payment in kind) in exchange for services, they have collective bargaining rights.
If the underlying rationale of Mr. Ohr’s decision is enough to merit its condemnation, the implications only compound the case. Giving collective bargaining rights to college athletes would mean opening up virtually every aspect of their participation in university sports (not just football — any sport that utilizes scholarships) to negotiation. Moreover, because individual schools, rather than conferences or divisions, are the bargaining units — and because public institutions are exempt from federal labor laws — the decision threatens to throw college sports into chaos. Imagine a Pac-12 where a unionized USC squares off against a UCLA squad without collective bargaining rights.
Northwestern will appeal this decision to the full NLRB in Washington, which would be wise to overrule Mr. Ohr’s flight of fancy. If the NCAA is lucky enough to dodge this bullet, however, it should use the reprieve wisely.
While the Orange County Register objects to the NLRB ruling, it was perhaps inevitable that players would seek legal redress if the NCAA failed to address the tension at the heart of major college sports: The NCAA and its member universities make big money from college athletics, while the players are unable to reap the rewards of an industry built on their talents.
How to solve that problem is an open question. But if it isn’t meaningfully addressed, universities should not be surprised to find the government imposing its own, inevitably flawed, solution.
— From the Orange County Register
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.