Social Security should allow old debts to die
The Social Security Administration paused its misguided efforts to collect debts more than a decade old, including dunning children of the dead. Collection efforts should expire when the original beneficiary does.
The retreat came last Monday following Washington Post reports the government was seizing the state and federal tax refunds headed to about 400,000 people. The aim was to collect long past due overpayments of $714 million. That’s OK. But going after adult children receiving benefits on their deceased parent’s record is bureaucratic overkill.
Carolyn Colvin, acting Social Security commissioner, called off the dogs, “pending a thorough review of our responsibility and discretion under the current law to refer debt to the Treasury Department.” Read between the lines and that means it’s unclear whether Social Security officials have the legal authority to collect from anyone other than the original beneficiary.
The collection effort began with one line in the 2008 Farm Bill that lifted the statute of limitations on money owed to the government for more than 10 years. The Treasury Department wrote rules allowing it to intercept tax refunds to settle the debts. It scooped up $2 billion this year, including $75 million delinquent for more than a decade.
Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, the ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, raised strong objections. “The statute of limitations language didn’t give the agency permission to collect debts where the debtor is deceased. It’s not clear where that authority came in,” he said.
The federal government is $17.5 trillion in debt, so it should aggressively go after what it’s owed. But when a Social Security recipient dies, efforts to settle debts arising from errors in their record should also be put to rest.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.