The use of force by police is a growing problem. Or is it?
Attorney General Eric Holder visited Ferguson, Missouri, on Wednesday to assure the community that the federal government will be taking an active role in the investigation of the death of 18-year-old Michael Brown. But Brown’s death raises larger questions about the use of force by police Holder and President Barack Obama need to confront.
This summer, three men in three states have died at the hands of police in questionable incidents. Clearly, local police, increasingly militaristic, also are becoming increasingly aggressive. Or are they? That’s the trouble: No one really knows.
State and local governments are not required to report any data on the use of force by police — and some don’t, producing an incomplete picture. In 2010, police officers killed 387 people in “justifiable homicides,” according to the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report. That number is up by almost one-third since 2000, after falling steadily in the previous decade.
Justifiable homicides by police reflect only the worst cases. What about the number of police shootings? The number of shots fired? The number of police injuries? Cases of excessive physical force? Civilian complaints? The federal government does not require any of that information to be collected and reported. It should.
In 1994, Congress directed the attorney general to “acquire data about the use of excessive force by law enforcement officers” and “publish an annual summary of the data.” But the Justice Department has mostly ignored that mandate. Other than periodic public surveys that ask about police interactions, there is a dearth of data on the use of force by police departments. Holder should direct the Justice Department to implement the 1994 mandate so the public can get a clear picture of the problem and keep government leaders accountable for improving it.
Congress also should consider legislation requiring local and state governments to collect and publicly report data on the use of force by and against police. Although some police departments are more restrained than they once were in the use of guns, in part because crime is lower, such reports would allow government officials to learn more about which kinds of strategies and practices work best at reducing crime and defusing tension. No less important, the public has a right to see where progress is occurring — and where it is not.
There also is more the Obama administration can do to curb excessive but not deadly displays of force, which were on shocking display last week in Ferguson, enabled by the deployment of military-style battalions, armed and fortified courtesy of the Defense Department’s 1033 program. The program, which provides local and state police departments with surplus military supplies, also lacks meaningful federal oversight. As police departments begin to resemble army units, there is a clear need not only for improved training, but also for greater accountability.
And that starts with better data.
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel should conduct a review of the 1033 program. And the president should extend an olive branch to Sen. Rand Paul, the Kentucky Republican who criticized the militaristic response in Ferguson, and encourage him to work with Democrats who share his concerns, one of whom already announced plans to introduce a bill limiting the Pentagon’s weaponry giveaway.
Holder was right to go to Ferguson. Now, he and his boss can further help the situation there by pushing for reform nationwide.
— Bloomberg View
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.