Your Views for March 15
Complaint had no merit
Tuesday’s article (March 11, Tribune-Herald) about the introduction of a bill on sustainable living, SB2274, is unfortunate in that it focuses on a baseless ethics complaint instead of the issues at hand, and spreads misinformation about the legislative process.
The article focused on a complaint filed with the Ethics Commission against me for introducing a measure on behalf of a constituent.
To clarify, the job of a legislator is to voice the concerns of constituents who seek change in their community. Organizations and individuals of all stripes take their ideas to their representatives, who may introduce a bill on their behalf even if they don’t fully agree with the idea.
This is what I did with SB2274, which I see as a good bill that could strengthen efforts toward sustainability in Hawaii.
Surely in Puna, where alternative lifestyles are so widespread, they deserve a path to legality.
Any new bill goes through a vigorous process of hearings in which its merits or shortcomings are discussed and public input considered. If the bill is seen to have merit, it moves on. Those who oppose the measure have ample opportunity to testify against it or suggest amendments.
In this case, rather than participating in the legislative process to improve the bill or oppose it through testimony, a small but vocal minority chose to file a complaint to the Ethics Commission in an effort to intimidate me into pulling the bill. I choose not to respond to such intimidation because I am doing my job honestly and fairly.
A preliminary review by the Ethics Commission found no basis for the complaint.
While it’s understandable some citizens might misunderstand the process, I am disappointed the article implied a genuine ethics concern, when a basic understanding of the legislative process would show the complaint is without merit.
It is my hope we can put such unnecessary contentiousness aside and let bills work their way through the legislative process, with constructive public input, as intended.
State senator for Puna and Ka‘u
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.