Your Views for May 14
As a former trustee for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (1984-96), I commend Kamanaopono Crabbe for doing his fiduciary responsibility and due diligence in the questions raised to Secretary of State John Kerry — questions dealing with our kanaka maoli legal status under international law that should have been raised long ago by OHA trustees.
OHA trustees are wrong to be offended by Crabbe’s action, which is necessary for an honest and legal understanding of our Native Hawaiian situation.
Last November, OHA unanimously passed a policy stating OHA will only “facilitate” a process toward nation-building — letting us explore all aspects of this journey, including the independence model. If a democracy is to function properly, it is important citizens be fully informed.
It stands to reason as part of OHA’s due diligence of nation-building, Crabbe make just such an inquiry to Secretary of State Kerry, for he followed policy voted upon by OHA trustees at the November Board of Trustees meeting.
OHA trustees and the Roll Commission say they are “only facilitating” our people’s quest in nation-building. However, OHA refused to address concerns raised by our Native Hawaiian community throughout these islands at town hall meetings, including an islandwide gathering April 10-11 at OHA headquarters in Honolulu.
There is concern an election for delegates to a Native Hawaiian Constitutional Convention at this time is premature, and is being hosted before the Native Hawaiian community at large is fully informed.
An educational process throughout these islands is necessary first. We must not allow this very delicate, crucial process to be stampeded into a September election led by the Roll Commission and OHA.
It is not pono for the facilitator of the nation-building process to attempt to “steer” the canoe. OHA trustees should not have rescinded Crabbe’s request. He was following the policy the trustees unanimously — and correctly — voted into effect last November.
Crabbe’s letter can only clarify this complex issue. In this instance, the OHA trustees that rescinded the letter to the secretary of state are wrong.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.