Is Mauna Loa due to erupt soon?
March 25 is the 30th anniversary of the most recent eruption of Mauna Loa, Hawaii Island’s largest volcano.
According to historical records, Mauna Loa has erupted 33 times since 1843, an average rate of 1 eruption every five years. If we look farther back into Mauna Loa’s eruptive history, during the last 3,000 years, it has erupted about once every six years.
These statistics might lead one to think the world’s largest active volcano is overdue to erupt.
We treat all volcanic hazards as random events; therefore, each event has no influence on the occurrence of the next event. Thus, even if a great deal of time has elapsed since the last eruption, it does not mean Mauna Loa is due to erupt again soon.
Furthermore, with random behavior, even if an eruption occurs this year, there is a chance an eruption could still occur next year.
We know enough about Hawaiian volcanoes to recognize the theorem is not 100 percent valid for Mauna Loa because once the volcano has erupted its stored magma, it needs time to fully replenish itself.
What are some of the other reasons why Mauna Loa has not erupted for some time?
Perhaps it is a dying volcano, moving away from the hot spot and nearing its demise.
Given the long-term eruption rate of one event every six years for the past 3,000 years and one every five years for the last roughly 170 years, it hardly seems likely the volcano is on its deathbed.
Some people might think the ongoing eruptions at Kilauea’s summit and East Rift Zone are robbing Mauna Loa of magma.
We know Kilauea and Mauna Loa lavas have different abundances of chemical constituents and are fed from different regions of the hot spot. The amount of lava erupted by the volcanoes — a tiny fraction of the magma supplied by the hot spot — is more than enough to feed eruptions at both volcanoes simultaneously.
Another reason proposed for the dearth of eruptions is that the great exhalation of gas from Kilauea somehow decreases the internal pressure within Mauna Loa.
The gas hypothesis is analogous to the flawed lava-robbing hypothesis: the volcanoes have different plumbing systems, and degassing at one volcano has no effect on the other.
Looking through the last 170 years, researchers noted eruptive periods at Kilauea and Mauna Loa are inversely correlated.
Using geologic mapping and C-14 dating, we can tell, for the past 2,500 years, when activity at one volcano is elevated, the other is relatively quiescent.
What is the reason for this apparent inverse level of activity between the volcanoes?
We already discounted decreased magma supply, magma piracy and reduced pressure from degassing. Another hypothesis involves buttressing effects, when one volcano pushes against the other and causes pressure changes within the other.
Researchers concluded Kilauea’s pressing against Mauna Loa would have minimal effect on the larger edifice, but Mauna Loa’s pushing against Kilauea could increase pressure within the smaller volcano.
An analogous study also looked at changing stress in the magma source region and how it impacts magma supply.
A recent hypothesis proposes eruptive activity at one volcano affects eruptions at the other because of factors that include magma supply, volcanic plumbing, magma pressure and flank motion (deformation).
It is based on the notion the current East Rift Zone eruption of Kilauea is driving the south flank seaward, leaving Mauna Loa’s southeast flank unbuttressed. Consequently, Mauna Loa’s flank would move eastward, resulting in the widening of the magma storage centers, decreased magma pressure and, therefore, diminished ability to erupt.
With the recent unprecedented upgrades to our monitoring capabilities, including seismic equipment and the addition of GPS stations, tiltmeters, gas sensors and Webcams, we can better investigate the complex interactions within and between the volcanoes.
The improved capabilities will increase our understanding of how volcanoes work and enhance our ability to forecast eruptions. The residents of Hawaii Island can rest assured we are diligently monitoring Mauna Loa and are better equipped to inform you if activity at the volcano changes.
Kilauea activity update
A lava lake within Halema‘uma‘u produced nighttime glow visible via HVO’s webcam during the past week.
The lava level fluctuated between 38 and 58 meters (125 and 190 feet) below the rim of the Overlook crater. On Kilauea’s East Rift Zone, the Kahauale‘a 2 flow continued to be active northeast of Pu‘u ‘O‘o. The active flow front was 8.2 km (5.1 miles) northeast of the vent on Pu‘u ‘O‘o on Wednesday, March 19. Webcam images indicate small, lava-sparked forest fires continue to burn.
Two earthquakes were reported felt on Hawaii Island during the past week.
At 1:25 p.m. Thursday, March 13, a magnitude 3.5 earthquake occurred 8 kilometers (5 miles) southwest of Kawaihae at a depth of 11 kilometers (7 miles). At 11:08 a.m. Wednesday, March 19, a magnitude 2.7 earthquake occurred 2 kilometers (1 mile) southwest of Paauilo at a depth of 16 kilometers (10 miles).
Visit the HVO website (http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov) for Volcano Awareness Month events and current Kilauea, Mauna Loa and Hual‘lai activity updates, recent volcano photos, recent earthquakes and more. Call 967-8862 for a Kilauea summary; email questions to askHVO@usgs.gov.
Volcano Watch (http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/volcanowatch/) is a weekly article and activity update written by scientists at the U.S. Geological Survey`s Hawaiian Volcano Observatory.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.