County purging property tax rolls
When Ben Franklin said, “nothing can be said to be certain except death and taxes,” he apparently wasn’t talking about Hawaii County.
A comparison of property owners claiming the county homeowner’s exemption against vital statistics from the state Department of Health discovered 1,200 deceased people benefiting from the exemption, some for as long as 10 years. That’s according to county Real Property Tax Administrator Stan Sitko.
Sitko, addressing the Real Property Tax Stakeholder’s Task Force on Thursday, said his office has been coordinating with state agencies such as the Department of Health and the Department of Taxation to purge the dead and nonresidents from the homeowner rolls. Property owners claiming the homeowner’s exemption get $40,000 of property value deducted from their assessment, thus lowering their tax.
The deduction increases for seniors, the disabled and veterans. A property owner older than 70 gets a $100,000 exemption, with an additional $50,000 for disabled property owners.
In Hawaii County, about 40,000 property owners claim the homeowner’s exemption.
To qualify, they must assert the property is their primary residence. The exemption automatically renews each year.
The oversight doesn’t rest entirely with the county. The Department of Health in 2005 quit sending vital statistics to the counties, thus hampering efforts to purge the tax rolls. It wasn’t until last year, following a mandate from the state Legislature, that the data became available again, said county Finance Director Nancy Crawford.
Crawford couldn’t immediately put a dollar figure on how much revenue the county might have lost because of the problem, but noted surviving spouses, children and other residents on the property might have qualified for the exemption anyway.
The exemption would have expired if the property was sold. Property owners were notified last year and had to pay the higher tax bill going forward or file for exemptions. Crawford said the county didn’t go after them for back taxes that might have been missed.
Checking the homeowner’s exemption list against vital records and tax returns was one of 40 recommendations in a 99-page March 2012 report by the International Association of Assessing Officers. The task force was another of the recommendations.
Kohala Councilwoman Margaret Wille, who co-chairs the task force with Hilo Councilman Dennis Onishi, praised the Finance Department for starting to tackle the list of improvements without waiting for the task force to get up and running.
Still, she said, there’s plenty to do.
“There hasn’t been a lot of accountability and a lot of coordination,” Wille said. “I think the key thing is, we need to tighten up the abuses. Someone pays for this, and if it’s not done fairly, then the rest of the people are paying for it.”
Sitko said Maui County addressed the issue by requiring property owners seeking the exemption to file their state tax returns annually with the county, thus proving their residency. Hawaii County would have to change its laws to follow that procedure, he said.
Meanwhile, he plans to scrub the county list regularly against vital statistics and is working on a memorandum of agreement with the state Tax Department for that agency to check the county list against the state tax rolls.
Finance Department officials were unsure, however, whether the county should cease its automatic renewal and instead require annual registration for the exemption.
“That’s 40,000 submittals coming in every year for our staff to review,” Crawford told the task force. “There would be a cost associated with that.”
Still, the homeowner’s exemption needs a thorough review, said task force member Al Inoue, a Hilo Realtor attending his first meeting Thursday.
“Property owners are taking advantage of the homeowner’s exemption,” Inoue said. “We think it’s quite significant.”
“Our difficulty is, we have to prove it,” responded Sitko.
Email Nancy Cook Lauer a firstname.lastname@example.org.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.