Man sentenced in pellet gun incident
A 55-year-old Mountain View man who was arrested last year after pointing a pellet gun at two police officers pleaded guilty Thursday to first-degree terroristic threatening.
In exchange for his plea, prosecutors dropped a second first-degree terroristic charge against Jonathan Paul Rodrigues Sr. Under terms of the deal, Rodrigues is expected to be sentenced by Hilo Circuit Judge Glenn Hara to four years probation, with 30 days in jail — with all but time already served taken under advisement — at 8:30 a.m. on Feb. 25.
Rodrigues told the judge he didn’t intentionally point the air rifle at the officers.
“I had a fight with my son that (previous) night and I took too much of my antidepressants,” he said. “I guess when I got up early in the morning, I wasn’t thinking straight, and my leg was bad, really bad, I couldn’t walk, so I grabbed my pellet gun and I walked outside. And the cops told me put it down, put it down.
“So, I just went for show ’em it’s just one pellet gun. And then, I guess, they said I went point ’em, so they ran, and they said throw down the gun. So, I went listen to that.”
“When you say a pellet gun, this was a gun that … looks like a real firearm?” Hara inquired.
“Yes,” Rodrigues replied.
Deputy Prosecutor Joseph Lee told the judge that if the case went to trial, the state would prove that Rodrigues terrorized Officer Paul Mangus “with disregard … specifically with the pointing of the gun, which the officer believed to be real. And the officer did fear that … his life was in physical danger, based on the conduct.”
Police responded to Rodrigues’ Keola Place home on Sept. 2 after receiving a report at about 8:30 p.m. about the affray, which involved a machete. When officers arrived, Rodrigues’ 25-year-old son, Jonathan Rodrigues Jr., reportedly ran into the forest. After emerging at about 11 p.m., he was taken to Hilo Medical Center where he was treated for what police called “substantial bodily injuries” and later released. After his release from the hospital, police arrested him on two unrelated bench warrants for contempt of court.
The pellet gun incident occurred at about 7:09 a.m. the following morning, and Rodrigues Sr. was taken into custody at about 7:20 a.m., police said.
The younger Rodrigues appeared on Sept. 3 in Hilo District Court to face the contempt charges with his head, neck, left upper arm and right wrist swathed in bandages. He confirmed afterward that his injuries were caused by a machete. Asked at that time what happened, he replied: “I totally forget. I don’t know. I was all drunk.”
A woman, who identified herself as the daughter of Rodrigues Sr. and sister of Rodrigues Jr., was in the courtroom gallery that afternoon and left the courthouse with Rodrigues Jr. She said that she was injured by the machete while trying to intervene in the dispute and required stitches to her wrist. The woman, who didn’t give her name, was wearing a bandage and brace on the injured wrist.
Rodrigues Sr. qualifies for, and requested, a deferral of his guilty plea. If the deferral is granted by Hara, his conviction for felony terroristic threatening will be erased from the record upon satisfactory completion of probation. Both Hara and Lee noted that the state reserves the right to argue against the deferral at sentencing.
“The court has agreed to follow the plea agreement … to the extent of probation and that there not be any jail time served beyond credit,” Hara said.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.