Residents blast proposed water rate hike
By JOHN BURNETT
Tribune-Herald staff writer
PAHOA — About 100 people attended a state Public Utilities Commission hearing Wednesday night at Keonepoko Elementary School on a request by Hawaiian Beaches Water Co. to raise its rates, and all but one testifier gave commissioners and the private water company an earful.
Kate Drago, president of Hawaiian Beaches Water, testified the company is “seeking a net revenue increase of $270,748, or an approximate 37 percent increase over present revenue rates.” The company supplies about 1,100 customers.
“The proposed change in rates, if approved by the commission, will allow us to better serve all customers and the Hawaiian Beaches community. It will also assist us in ensuring a system that is both safe and reliable,” she said.
Drago said “a revenue increase is needed to help us keep pace with rising operating costs, a significant decline in customer usage since the last rate case was filed in 2009, and to recover expenses incurred for additional capital improvements that were necessary since the 2009 rate case.”
Those improvements include a new office building and warehouse, a backup generator and the installation of a well with a new 330,000 gallon storage tank and related electrical and piping facilities.
Jeffrey Ono, executive director of the state’s Division of Consumer Advocacy, said his office is “taking an independent look” at the application but “has not completed its analysis” of the request, so could not make a recommendation to PUC.
Drago wrote in a Nov. 20 letter to customers that at present rates, the company projects an operating loss of $87,823 in 2014. The proposal would raise the fixed monthly service charge for those with a 5/8-inch pipe from $30 a month to $41.43, a 38.1 percent increase. Those with a one-inch pipe would pay $45.20, a 50.1 percent increase. The monthly water consumption charge per 1,000 gallons would go up from $4.22 to $5.79, a 37 percent hike.
After Drago and Ono spoke, the fireworks began immediately.
Mary Cabatbat took the microphone and turned toward the audience, immediately drawing an admonition from commission chairwoman Hermina Morita to address the commissioners.
“I’ll try my best to look at you, but I came to speak to them,” Cabatbat said.
“This is about the second or third time they’ve raised the rates since this woman took over the company. … Miller and Lieb (who supplied water to Hawaiian Beaches until 2007) was far more gracious than these people,” she said, adding the company provides “no maintenance whatsover, none personally.”
Cabatbat told the audience they should file “a class action lawsuit to get your rights back.”
Richard Gorman called the proposed increase “not fair.”
“What’s the next (increase) going to be? $100 for two people?” he said.
Mandy Kaniaupio said the Lalakea Street home owned by her father, Miles Kajiyama, burned down Nov. 29.
“My reason for being here is the fire company ran out of water,” she said. “… If there’s a rate increase, I would like to see more fire hydrants.
“… According to the fire company, they could have partially saved his house if they hadn’t run out of water,” she said.
She said there is only one hydrant to serve the entire subdivision despite people paying their water bills.
“Sometimes, I pay mines late,” she admitted. “Sorry. But that’s because I live paycheck to paycheck.”
Mark Prescott, the water company’s vice president and Drago’s brother, confirmed there is only one hydrant for HWBC’s 1,100 customers, but said that was also the case when Miller and Lieb supplied water to the subdivision.
Ross Watson said it makes no sense to raise rates during a bad economy.
“We gonna have to cut off the water and make catchment. We cannot afford it,” he said. “This community been here for 50 years and no county water yet?
“… These guys are jacking these prices so high, us guys can do nothing.”
Rocklyn Spencer-Dicey said “the cost of living is high” and “the wages are low.”
“Why are we, as customers, asked to finance a new office and warehouse? The company is treating the customers as its own personal piggy bank,” she said. “Water for profit is a terrible idea.”
Don Vallance, who is 92, urged those in attendance “don’t be deluded.”
“This meeting is a waste of time,” he said. “… The PUC was established to protect us from monopolies and they’re not doing their job. We’re paying their salaries. We should fire them.”
Vallance predicted the rate hike would be approved and another would follow shortly.
“The next one is electronic meters so they can lay off their staff and make a profit,” he said.
Bruce Darny, a disabled Army veteran of the Vietnam War asked: “Who does the audits on all this paperwork that was submitted to see if the things were actually done or needed?”
Replied Morita: “The investigation is just beginning.”
Darny noted the reasons the company gave for the increase didn’t include “public safety … putting fire hydrants in.”
“We just had a house burn because there was no water pressure, no fire hydrants,” he said.
Neil Bell wondered aloud “if the owners did their due diligence when they bought the company.”
“How good is the stewardship, the management of this company?” he queried. “Personally, I’ve never heard a company ask its customers to pay for a new office. … When the office is paid for, do we get a reduction?”
Denyse Temple asked if the company “had a drop in the people using the water, why did we need new wells?”
Only one individual, Kevin Bachman, spoke in favor of the increase.
“There has been some steady improvement,” he said. “… There has been some additional wells added and this is one of the only places I’ve seen where there is a backup generator.
“I know there isn’t a storm here every day, but if there is one, they’re ready.”
He said the company deserves “some consideration.”
“People are getting clean water and water that has been tested for less than $2 a day,” he said.
Email John Burnett at email@example.com.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.