Feds side with Utah gay couples
SALT LAKE CITY — Gay couples in Utah have experienced a helter-skelter wave of emotions over the last three weeks: They were suddenly allowed to marry, then saw the weddings stopped by the U.S. Supreme Court and were told the state wouldn’t recognize the unions.
Now, the federal government has intervened and said it will recognize their weddings.
The announcement Friday by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder that the government will honor gay marriage in Utah marked the latest strong show of support for same-sex weddings from the Obama administration. The action means that more than 1,000 same-sex couples who were married in Utah in the last month can file federal taxes jointly, get Social Security benefits for spouses and request legal immigration status for partners, among other benefits.
Gay couples rejoiced over the news.
Seth Anderson and Michael Ferguson were the first gay couple to legally marry in Utah, and they were thrilled at the thought of having the same federal benefits as straight couples. They plan to file their taxes jointly because of the change.
“Our apartment burst into celebratory anthems of Cher and Beyoncé,” said Seth Anderson about his reaction to Holder’s statement. “It is a great feeling to know the federal government stands with us, especially in a state that has for years tried to exclude us.”
A federal judge overturned Utah’s ban on same-sex marriage on Dec. 20, and hundreds of couples got married. The U.S. Supreme Court put a halt to the weddings until the courts sort out the matter. Utah then declared it would not recognize the weddings, but would allow couples to continue to receive whatever benefits they had obtained before the high court ruling.
Utah leaders reiterated on Friday that the state would not recognize same-sex weddings, meaning couples can receive federal benefits but are limited at the state level. The Mormon church weighed in again Friday, instructing local leaders that same-sex wedding ceremonies and receptions are prohibited in its churches and reiterating its belief that homosexuality is not condoned by God.
But for same-sex couples who have experienced a wave of emotions, the show of support from the federal government turned a rally at the Utah state capitol into a raucous celebration.
People held signs that read, “Two moms make a right,” ”Love is love” and “Marriage is a human right — not a heterosexual privilege” and “We are Family” played through loudspeakers.
Laura Fields, who retired from the Air Force in 2006, said her new wife can now get a military identification card that will allow her to take advantage of benefits offered military spouses, such as health coverage and access to commissaries and exchanges on the base to buy food and household items at a discount.
Until now, Fields said she has had to carry an extra insurance policy to cover her partner of five years. They live in a small city outside Hill Air Force Base in northern Utah and married on Christmas Eve.
“It has a real effect,” Fields said. “Legal limbo hurts.”
President Barack Obama welcomed Holder’s determination, said White House spokesman Jay Carney. He said he didn’t know whether Obama specifically discussed the issue with Holder before the decision, but added the president has publicly expressed his support for same-sex marriage and equal rights for all Americans. Obama declared his support of gay marriage in May 2012.
Holder’s decision came days after Utah officials said they would not recognize the marriages. The office of Gov. Gary Herbert told state agencies this week to put a freeze on proceeding with any new benefits for the newly married gay and lesbian couples until the courts resolve the issue. But the state attorney general’s office has told local clerks to finish paperwork for same-sex marriages completed before the Supreme Court issued a temporary halt.
In a statement Friday afternoon, Herbert’s office said Holder’s announcement was unsurprising, but state officers should comply with federal law if they’re providing federal services.
The Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will consider the long-term question of whether gay couples have a right to marry in Utah. The state’s voters approved the ban in 2004.
Federal government agencies have previously confirmed that same-sex couples in other states are entitled to federal benefits, but this is the first time Holder has publicly issued this kind of guidance, said Douglas NeJaime, a professor of law at the University of California, Irvine.
“Symbolically, it’s an important step that the federal government has taken,” NeJaime said.
But it’s not surprising, he said. The federal government has been making clear for several years that same-sex marriages should be honored.
“The fed government has been pushing up against the states that do not recognize same-sex marriages already,” NeJaime said. “This is another step in that direction.”
Holder said in a video on the Justice Department’s website that the government will coordinate among agencies to make sure Utah couples get federal benefits.
On Friday, the Mormon church issued another statement that explained its beliefs on gay marriage.
“Changes in the civil law do not, indeed cannot, change the moral law that God has established,” the statement said. “God expects us to uphold and keep His commandments regardless of divergent opinions or trends in society. His law of chastity is clear: sexual relations are proper only between a man and a woman who are legally and lawfully wedded as husband and wife.”
Leaders said they and others who oppose same-sex marriages are entitled to express their views without fear of retribution. Likewise, the church urged its members to be kind and respectful to proponents of same-sex marriage.
Associated Press writers Michelle L. Price in Salt Lake City and Jim Kuhnhenn in Washington D.C., contributed to this report. Yost reported from Washington, D.C.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.