RALEIGH, N.C. — North Carolina rolled back its “bathroom bill” Thursday in a bid to end the yearlong backlash over transgender rights that has cost the state dearly in business projects, conventions and basketball tournaments. ADVERTISING RALEIGH, N.C. — North
RALEIGH, N.C. — North Carolina rolled back its “bathroom bill” Thursday in a bid to end the yearlong backlash over transgender rights that has cost the state dearly in business projects, conventions and basketball tournaments.
RALEIGH, N.C. — North Carolina rolled back its “bathroom bill” Thursday in a bid to end the yearlong backlash over transgender rights that has cost the state dearly in business projects, conventions and basketball tournaments.
The compromise plan , announced Wednesday night by the Democratic governor and leaders of the Republican-controlled legislature, was worked out under mounting pressure from the NCAA, which threatened to take away more sporting events from the basketball-obsessed state as long as the law, also known as House Bill 2, remained on the books.
The new measure cleared the House and Senate and was signed by Gov. Roy Cooper in a matter of hours.
Among other things, it repeals the best-known section of HB2: a requirement that transgender people use the public restrooms that correspond to the sex on their birth certificate.
“For over a year now, House Bill 2 has been a dark cloud hanging over our great state,” the governor said in announcing the signing. “It has stained our reputation, it has discriminated against our people, and it has caused great economic harm in many of our communities.”
The American Civil Liberties Union and gay rights activists complained that the new law still denies gay and transgender people certain protections from discrimination, and they demanded nothing less than full repeal.
As a result, it was unclear whether the retreat from HB2 would stop the boycotts or satisfy the NCAA. The NCAA had no immediate comment.
Republican Rep. Scott Stone, who lives in Charlotte, urged his colleagues to vote for the new bill. It passed the House 70-48.
“We are impeding the growth in our revenues, in our abilities to do more things for tourism, for teacher pay … while we have this stigma hanging over us,” Stone said. “The time has come for us to get out from under the national spotlight for negative things.”
Conservatives, meanwhile, staunchly defended HB2 and condemned the new measure.
“This bill is at best a punt. At worst it is a betrayal of principle,” Republican Sen. Dan Bishop, a primary sponsor of HB2, said on the Senate floor as the rollback was approved 32-16 , with nine of 15 Democrats among the yes votes.
While the new measure eliminates the rule on transgender bathroom use, it also makes clear that state legislators — not local government or school officials — are in charge of policy on public restrooms.
HB2 had invalidated any local ordinances that protect gay or transgender people from discrimination in the workplace or in public accommodations. Under the new law, local governments can’t enact any new such protections until December 2020.
That moratorium, according to GOP leaders, will allow time for pending federal litigation over transgender rights to play out.
“This is a significant compromise from all sides on an issue that has been discussed and discussed and discussed in North Carolina for a long period of time,” Senate leader Phil Berger said. “It is something that I think satisfies some people, dissatisfies some people, but I think it’s a good thing for North Carolina.”
Gay rights activists blasted the proposal, saying it was not a true repeal.
“It doesn’t matter if you are a Democrat or a Republican, if you vote for this bill, you are not a friend of the LGBT community,” Equality North Carolina executive director Chris Sgro said. “You are not standing on the right side of the moral arc of history or with the civil rights community.”
James Esseks, director of the ACLU LGBT Project, said lawmakers “should be ashamed of this backroom deal.” ”This is not a repeal of HB2. Instead, they’re reinforcing the worst aspects of the law,” he said in a statement.
The governor said he would have preferred a bill that extended LGBT protections even further, but that wasn’t possible while the GOP holds veto-proof majorities in both legislative chambers. “This is not a perfect deal, and this is not my preferred solution,” he said.
Cooper was elected in November on a platform that called for repeal of HB2, which was enacted under the man he defeated, Republican Gov. Pat McCrory.
The deal came together after the NCAA warned that North Carolina wouldn’t be considered for championship events from 2018 to 2022 unless HB2 was changed. The college sports governing body said it would start making decisions on host cities this week and announce them in April.
Republican House Speaker Tim Moore said that he hadn’t spoken directly to the NCAA but that he had been told by business leaders who served as intermediaries that the bill should prove acceptable to the NCAA.
The NCAA already pulled championship events from the state this year because of HB2. Also, businesses canceled expansions or moves to North Carolina, the NBA withdrew its All-Star Game from Charlotte, and entertainers such as Bruce Springsteen canceled concerts.
An Associated Press analysis this week found that the law would cost the state more than $3.76 billion in lost business over a dozen years.
On Thursday, Springsteen guitarist Steven Van Zandt tweeted that the legislature’s move fell short: “It ain’t over until the LGBT community and the ACLU say it’s over.”
During impassioned debate on the House floor, conservatives accused their colleagues of caving in to pressure from college basketball.
Republican Rep. Bert Jones sarcastically suggested that the banners outside the building be replaced with a NCAA flag and the white flag of surrender.
And GOP Rep. Carl Ford said: “If we could have props in here, I’d take a basketball covered in money and roll it down the middle aisle there. Because that’s what this is about: money and basketball. My family is not for sale. My constituents are not for sale.”
HB2 supporters argued that the bathroom law was needed to preserve people’s privacy and protect them from sexual predators. Opponents said that was nonsense and that the danger was imaginary.
