Jurors have long list to weigh
HONOLULU — Before jurors reach the yes or no question asking whether a former Hawaii soldier should be sentenced to death for his daughter’s murder, they must weigh a long list of reasons for and against giving him capital punishment.
Jurors deciding the fate of Naeem Williams are scheduled to begin the first full day of deliberations today.
They previously convicted him of murder in his 5-year-old daughter Talia’s 2005 beating death. Now, they will embark on a process to determine whether he is put to death or spends the rest of his life in prison.
It’s a historic decision because this is the first death penalty case that has gone to trial in the history of Hawaii’s statehood.
Hawaii’s territorial government abolished the death penalty in 1957, before the islands became a state. Because the crimes happened in military housing, Williams was tried in the federal justice system, which makes the death penalty available even in states that don’t have capital punishment.
According to 35 pages of jury instructions, the jury must determine which of seven aggravating factors the prosecution proved that justify death.
During proceedings to determine if Williams is eligible for the death penalty, the jury found the prosecution proved two other aggravating factors:
• The killing was especially heinous that involved torture of physical abuse.
• And that Talia was particularly vulnerable because of her youth.
The jury must agree unanimously that each of the aggravating factors were proven beyond a reasonable doubt for them to be used to consider his sentence.
The factors include:
• Williams delayed seeking medical attention for Talia.
• He retained custody of Talia even though he knew there were others who could care for her without abuse.
• Talia was also vulnerable because of her special needs, including developmental delays and asthma.
Williams testified during the trial that he regularly beat Talia to discipline her for bathroom accidents. He later read a statement to jurors apologizing for killing her and asking them to let him live so that he can be a better father to his two other children.
The jury must also consider a list of 149 mitigating factors the defense offered as reasons to spare his life. The standard for considering these factors is lower and doesn’t require a unanimous vote. They are wide-ranging and include:
— Williams was raised in a system of corporal punishment.
— He served overseas in the Army.
— He has an intellectual disability.
— The girl’s stepmother influenced him to violently abuse Talia.
The jury’s next step will be to weigh the factors.
“You should not simply count the number of factors, but consider the particular sentence of each, which may be given different weight or value by different jurors,” their instructions state. “For example, you may find that one mitigating factor outweighs all aggravating factors combined, or that the aggravating factors proved do not, standing alone, justify imposition of a sentence of death.”
Defense attorney Michael Burt in his closing statement last week beseeched jurors to find that mitigating factor No. 149 outweighs everything else: “Under all the facts and circumstances, the jury wishes to show mercy.”
Follow Jennifer Sinco Kelleher at http://www.twitter.com/JenHapa .
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.