The irrational rush to ban e-cigarettes
Drinking a can of soda looks very much like drinking a can of beer. But it’s not. Likewise, puffing on an electronic cigarette to sate one’s urge for nicotine looks very much like smoking a real cigarette. But it’s not.
You wouldn’t know that from the agitations of anti-smoking busybodies, who can’t tolerate anything that remotely resembles smoking.
Their consensus: E-cigarettes must be banned.
As Reason.com’s Nick Gillespie wrote in a Sunday piece for The Daily Beast website, e-cigarettes increasingly are subjected to bans, prohibitions and all-around undue criticism. Legislation under consideration in Massachusetts would ban giving away e-cigarettes or using them anywhere that tobacco use has been banned, even though e-cigarettes don’t have any tobacco.
It would seem the biggest problem for these nanny-staters is that they are victims of their own success. In the mid-1960s, Mr. Gillespie noted, more than 40 percent of Americans smoked. Today just 20 percent of the population lights up.
However, much of the decrease came in the two decades after the U.S. surgeon general’s 1964 report, which “told Americans what they already knew: cigarettes were called ‘coffin nails’ and ‘cancer sticks’” for good reason, he wrote.
Now, with the advent and growing popularity of e-cigarettes — battery-powered, reusable devices that allow users to inhale and exhale smoke- and odor-free nicotine vapor — the anti-tobacco lobby has an opportunity to make more headway, to help more people regain their health and kick the habit.
But because the solution looks like smoking — even though it really isn’t — the zealots can’t have that. Better to have more dead from lung cancer.
The federal government long ago clamped down on cigarettes with huge regulations, not the least of which is requiring the disclaimer on packaging noting just how unhealthful the product is. Furthermore, government at all levels continues to pile sin taxes on cigarettes.
The now-booming e-cigarette industry was born out of this overwhelming hostility to tobacco, but it appears the anti-tobacco lobby also wants to stifle those entrepreneurs, who are actually helping people quit smoking. And governments would appear to fear the loss of all that cigarette tax revenue.
Everyone acknowledges the health issues and costs associated with smoking tobacco. But the movement to shut down an extremely sensible alternative is totally misguided.
Too often, the government rushes to tax, regulate or ban every product and practice. What is the problem with leaving the e-cigarette industry alone, allowing it to grow and help people quit smoking? Would that be such a bad thing?
A version of this editorial appeared Aug. 29 in the Las Vegas Review-Journal.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.