Looking forward to the new Congress
By GAIL COLLINS
New York Times News Service
Right now you are probably asking yourself: Will the new Congress work any better than the last one?
There’s always a chance. Because it’s new. Also, the bar is low, since some say the departing 112th Congress was the worst in history, because of its stupendous lack of productivity and a favorability rating that once polled lower than the idea of a Communist takeover of America. On the very last day the Republican-led House was in session, the Republican governor of New Jersey, Chris Christie, announced it was “why the American people hate Congress.” This was after Speaker John Boehner failed to bring up a bill providing aid to the victims of the megastorm Sandy. Disaster relief joined a long list of bills that the 112th Congress could not get its act together to approve, along with reforming the farm subsidies and rescuing the Postal Service. Those pieces of legislation were all written and passed by the Senate, a group that’s generally less proactive than a mummy. To be fair to the House, it takes a lot of effort to vote to repeal Obamacare 33 times.
Our outgoing lawmakers did retrieve us from that “fiscal cliff.” Although they were the ones who pushed us off. And they left the new Congress facing a debt chasm, a sequestration void and a government-stoppage bottomless pit. So, this last one was pretty bad. The best argument I can make for it is none of the outgoing members brained a colleague with a cane, as did happen in the 34th Congress. Which also was being led by President Franklin Pierce. So I would give the 34th the ribbon.
The new Congress will have a few more Democrats in the House and Senate, which will not make any difference whatsoever. On the plus side, the proportion of political nut jobs may be a little lower. Rep. Allen West, R-Fla., who once called President Barack Obama “a low-level socialist agitator,” is a member no more. Rep. Joe Walsh, R-Ill., was defeated by Tammy Duckworth, a military veteran who lost both legs in Iraq and who Walsh claimed was not one of “our true heroes.” Walsh was also an excellent reminder of an important rule in U.S. politics: Refrain from criticizing the other party for fiscal irresponsibility until you can work out a resolution of that child support issue.
Tea Party favorite Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., has departed, too, even though his term was only half over, to take a lucrative job at the helm of the Heritage Foundation.
Thanks to the blog Smart Politics, I am able to report that this is normal behavior in South Carolina: One-third of all U.S. senators from South Carolina have resigned over the course of our history. (South Carolina is also the state that gave us the guy with the cane back in 1856.) DeMint was replaced by Rep. Tim Scott, whose seat will be filled in a special election this spring. Right now one of the possible candidates is Mark Sanford, the governor who flew to Argentina for a meeting with his lover while his staff said he was hiking on the Appalachian Trail. Another much-discussed potential contender is Jenny Sanford, his former wife. Pray Jenny and Mark Sanford run against each other.
DeMint’s departure was only unusual for its abruptness. Members of Congress regularly glom onto high-paying jobs in the private sector. The Center for Responsive Politics counts 373 former House and Senate members who are currently working as lobbyists. That includes the former Utah Sen. Bob Bennett, who announced that he would be filing his official papers on Thursday, the exact moment the legal two-year revolving door ban expires. Bennett had complained about the cooling-off period being a restraint of his constitutional rights, which left him forced to eke out a living as a consultant for the BennettGroup and a member of a high-profile Washington law firm.
When it comes to a sudden departure, though, the new titleholder has to be Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, R-Mo., who quit Congress to become president and chief executive of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association less than a month after she was re-elected to another term. She said she had found “a new way to serve.” The Center for Responsive Politics noted that the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association was not only a big lobbying group, but also Emerson’s “biggest lifetime campaign contributor.”
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.