Rand Paul strikes blow against drone hits
In a scene straight out of Frank Capra’s classic 1939 movie, “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,” Sen. Rand Paul on Wednesday launched a filibuster against the nomination of John O. Brennan as director of the Central Intelligence Agency. A classic filibuster means a senator speaks until the U.S. Senate votes to invoke cloture, or the end of debate, which requires 60 votes instead of a majority of 51.
In recent years, a “filibuster” has evolved to mean that an item temporarily is shelved, avoiding the long-winded speeches. Opponents of filibusters insist that they are anti-democratic, that a simple majority should decide every vote in the Senate. But, as a radio commentator in the movie advises when Sen. Smith, played by Jimmy Stewart, begins to speak, “Half of official Washington is here to see democracy’s finest show, the filibuster, the right to talk your head off, the American privilege of free speech in its most dramatic form. The least man in that chamber, once he gets and holds that floor by the rules, can hold it and talk as long as he can stand on his feet.”
Sen. Paul, a Kentucky Republican, is appropriately concerned. Brennan, who has been deputy counterterrorism adviser to President Barack Obama, has encouraged more attacks in foreign countries using remotely controlled aircraft against people the White House deems to be terrorists. The president is the final arbiter in these strikes. There is no judge, jury or defense attorney before someone is targeted and killed. Sen. Paul does not want that practice to spread to American soil, against our own citizens.
Sen. Paul has tried to get Attorney General Eric Holder to take a stand on the legality of domestic drone strikes. Holder eventually wrote, “It is possible, I suppose, to imagine an extraordinary circumstance in which it would be necessary and appropriate under the Constitution and applicable laws of the United States for the president to authorize the military to use lethal force within the territory of the United States.”
In a letter, Sen. Paul replied: “The U.S. attorney general’s refusal to rule out the possibility of drone strikes on American citizens and on American soil is more than frightening — it is an affront the constitutional due process rights of all Americans.” Hence, the filibuster.
The Fifth Amendment clearly states, “No person shall … be deprived of life, liberty or property, without due process of law.” This protection of individual liberty stretches back to England’s Magna Carta in 1215.
However the filibuster turns out — Brennan’s nomination sailed through the Intelligence Committee on a bipartisan vote — Sen. Paul is right to bring the drone issue to national attention. And the Senate should not confirm Brennan until the Obama administration pledges not to use drones to attack Americans in their own country.
REPRINTED FROM THE ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.