The Rock rocks G.I. Joe sequel
Las Vegas Review-Journal
As franchises go, “G.I. Joe” was less a fixer-upper than the sort of thing you burn to the ground for the insurance money. “G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra,” with its biomechanical super suits and underwater shenanigans, was a borderline-unwatchable crapfest. Stiffly acted with a just-doing-this-for-the-paycheck vibe, it was less inventive than anything 8-year-olds could concoct while playing with the action figures. “G.I. Joe: Retaliation,” meanwhile, improves on the original in every conceivable way. Compared with “The Rise of Cobra,” it feels like a best-picture nominee. Compared with everything else in the marketplace, though, it still feels destined for the bargain bin.
“Retaliation” wastes little time distancing itself from its predecessor. Only Duke (Channing Tatum), Snake Eyes (Ray Park), Storm Shadow (Byung-hun Lee) and the president (Jonathan Pryce) return. Cobra Commander is back, too, but Joseph Gordon-Levitt had the good sense, or the right lawyer, to get out of playing him again.
“Retaliation” severs even more ties with a massacre that decimates the remaining Joes, leaving three of them — Roadblock (Dwayne Johnson), Lady Jaye (Adrianne Palicki, “Friday Night Lights”) and Flint (DJ Cotrona, “Detroit 1-8-7”) — cut off from the world, branded traitors and marked for death. Holed up in an abandoned inner-city rec center, the three are forced to carry on without their high-tech gizmos and kajillion-dollar subterranean compound.
It’s the best thing that could have happened to the franchise, as it gives “Retaliation” a sense of realism that was sorely lacking in the original. Or at least as close to realism as you can get in a movie about a grown man named Roadblock chasing down a freakshow who favors SS-style bondage gear.
“Retaliation” director John M. Chu clearly loves the characters. Perhaps a bit too much. Written by “Zombieland’s” Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick, “Retaliation” is designed to appease fans. And, judging from the joyful yelps from the die-hards at the screening, it worked. But it’s not terribly inclusive if you don’t know your Destro from your Zartan. Also helpful for newbies: Snake Eyes, the black-clad, masked ninja dude, is a good guy. Storm Shadow, the white-clad, masked ninja dude, is a bad guy. They have history. You’re welcome.
Their scenes provide the best action, whether they’re squaring off against each other or zip-lining into a side-of-a-mountain battle that must be thrilling for anyone who hasn’t seen Cirque du Soleil’s “Ka.” Chu stages their fight scenes with the balletic grace appropriate for a director best known for two “Step Up” movies and the Justin Bieber concert film — the latter of which also involved what some people consider dancing.
Most of the fun comes from Johnson and, as the original G.I. Joe, Bruce Willis.
The action vets class up the joint while bringing the requisite deadpan swagger, not to mention their respective trademark grins and smirks. They’re both highly entertaining. They’re just not really playing characters. Johnson is essentially being The Rock while Willis deviates only slightly from his standard action-movie hero.
Then again, no one else is given much in the way of character development. “Retaliation” remains leaps and bounds ahead of “The Rise of Cobra.” It’s a stunning reclamation of a presumed-dead franchise.
At this pace, “G.I. Joe” could crank out a genuinely good movie after only five or six more tries.
Christopher Lawrence is the movie critic for the Las Vegas Review-Journal. Contact him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.