Contractors’ pasts could haunt them
By ERIN MILLER
A bill before state legislators would allow state and county officials to consider a contractor’s past performance when a new project is up for bid.
HB 1374, introduced by House Finance Committee Vice Chairman Aaron Ling Johansen, R-Moanalua, would add a mechanism to the procurement code to consider whether a company previously completed projects that had significant delays or cost overruns.
“The usual principle of awarding contracts to the lowest bidder may lead to substandard work, because contractors may artificially lower bids to gain a contract, in spite of a lack of qualifications or worse a record of poor performance in the past,” the bill’s introductory language said.
Johansen was unavailable for comment Monday, but the bill passed through the House Finance Committee unamended with unanimous support.
Mayor Billy Kenoi said he would be tracking the measure as it continued through the Legislature.
“If a contractor has cost taxpayers money and time, then its lack of performance should have some bearing on its ability to get contracts in the future,” Kenoi said.
State procurement code is relatively strict in dictating which factors government officials may or may not consider when it comes to awarding contracts, Corporation Counsel Lincoln Ashida said.
“It makes for better government,” he added.
Finance Director Nancy Crawford disagreed that the procurement code prohibits government officials from looking at a company’s past performance, though. She said the county can issue a request for proposals and write broad criteria to include quality measures that the contracting company must meet.
“You’re considering all kinds of criteria other than price,” Crawford said.
She said she agreed with the state Procurement Office’s testimony, which laid out several ways in which the procurement code allows for past work to be incorporated into bid information. The General Contractors Association of Hawaii also opposed the bill.
Labor management consortium Pacific Resource Partnership testified in favor of the measure.
“PRP, in its capacity as construction industry ‘watch dogs,’ has monitored multiple private, as well as public works projects over the recent years,” Ryan Kobayashi wrote in his testimony for Monday’s hearing. “We feel that is a great ‘first step’; the ‘weeding out’ of unqualified contractors helps to ensure the probability that the right contractor is chosen for public works contracts, but legislation such as this only makes it less likely that the wrong contractor is chosen.”
Email Erin Miller at email@example.com.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.