County comes to defense of Leithead Todd
By NANCY COOK LAUER
Stephens Media Hawaii
Hawaii County is asking a 3rd Circuit Court judge to allow it to intervene to help defend Bobby Jean Leithead Todd’s position as Environmental Management director after discovering that Councilwoman Brenda Ford’s petition challenging her relies on a relatively obscure legal premise that prevents the county from doing so.
Ford’s petition, “in the nature of quo warranto,” asks the court to compel Leithead Todd to come forward and justify her qualifications for her position. Quo warranto is most commonly used in Hawaii to challenge elected officials’ qualifications for office, if for example, they don’t live in their district. It also was tried unsuccessfully by the so-called “Birther” movement in challenging President Obama’s birth certificate and citizenship and thus his qualification to be president.
Deputy Corporation Counsel Laureen Marten said the case law is clear from a Hawaii Supreme Court ruling on a Maui case that the county isn’t obligated to defend Leithead Todd in this type of action. But the county wants to be involved, she said, because “we have an interest in the outcome.”
She said the county on Friday filed a motion to intervene.
Leithead Todd has hired her own attorney, but she declined Wednesday to discuss the case or even provide her attorney’s name.
“I am hiring my own lawyer to represent me,” Leithead Todd said.
Judge Ronald Ibarra has set an 8:30 a.m. Oct. 9 hearing date on the case. The hearing will be in Kona.
In a petition filed Aug. 8, Ford’s attorney, Michael Matsukawa, cites the county charter’s requirement that the DEM director have “an engineering degree or a degree in a related field.”
“Since the respondent Bobby Jean Leithead Todd does not have an engineering degree or a degree in an engineering-related field, the respondent does not have the qualification required to hold the office of director of the Department of Environmental Management for the county of Hawaii,” the petition states.
Matsukawa did not return a phone message for comment on why he chose an action against Leithead Todd directly, rather than against the county or the mayor, who appointed her to the position.
The County Council, by a 6-3 vote, confirmed the appointment in July. Ford, North Kona Councilwoman Karen Eoff and Kohala Councilwoman Margaret Wille voted no.
The petition is seeking legal fees from Leithead Todd, in addition to a ruling that Leithead Todd be “restrained from performing the duties of that office.” If Leithead Todd, using her own attorney, wins the case, she in turn can ask the county to reimburse her legal fees.
Mayor Billy Kenoi had named Leithead Todd to the position in a Cabinet reshuffling earlier this summer.
Leithead Todd has a bachelor’s degree in English and a law degree from the William S. Richardson School of Law. She was director of the Department of Environmental Management for two years under former Mayor Harry Kim, before the charter was amended to require the engineering or related degree.
Leithead Todd was deputy corporation counsel for nine years, from 1987 to 1993 and from 2003 to 2007. She also served as the legislative auditor for the county and as a member of the County Council from 1996 to 2003. Most recently, she served as planning director since Kenoi’s election as mayor.
Kenoi said that the charter requirement for Environmental Management director is different from the requirement for Public Works director, which states that “the director shall be a registered professional engineer.”
But Charter Commission members, during discussions of the proposed engineering requirement for Environmental Management director, talked about related fields as being in hard technical sciences such as environmental science, according to the minutes for the Jan. 21, 2010, meeting. Eoff, who had served as secretary to the commission, said her recollection of the meetings led to her vote against confirming Leithead Todd.
Voters in 2010 passed the ballot amendment by a vote of 34,209 to 9,787.
Email Nancy Cook Lauer at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.