County delays GMO vote
By TOM CALLIS
Tribune-Herald staff writer
The Hawaii County Council will have to wait until the end of the month to consider any action on a bill to limit the use of genetically modified crops.
The council, meeting as the Committee on Public Safety and Mass Transit, finished its second-straight day of testimony Wednesday on Bill 79.
But consideration was delayed after council members said they wanted to see proposed changes underlined in the legislation.
In response, Kohala Councilwoman Margaret Wille withdrew the amendments she introduced May 29 in order to offer a “Ramsayer” version, which would highlight proposed changes.
The meeting was recessed, at least tentatively, until July 30.
Testimony will not be taken.
“It is time for us to deliberate and this is what we’re going to do,” said South Kona/Ka‘u Councilwoman Brenda Ford, who chairs the committee.
Ford initiated the discussion over recessing the issue. She said that looking at two different versions can get confusing.
“I don’t know how the public is possibly going to understand this,” Ford said.
Wille, who introduced the bill, said she had similar concerns.
She has additional amendments she wanted to propose and said she will include those in the next proposed draft.
That is expected to include both the removal of U.S. Department of Agriculture Level 3 biosafety requirements and buffer zones for existing transgenic crops, which would be exempted from the GMO ban.
Her proposed changes also include exemptions for the floral industry, which hopes to benefit from genetic engineering.
Wednesday was the fourth time the committee has taken up the legislation. It was first brought before it May 14.
Action by the committee was last delayed late May after Wille introduced amendments.
Council members said they wanted to hear additional testimony and they got plenty of it.
The follow-up meeting was scheduled only for Tuesday but was continued for an extra day after hundreds of people packed council chambers and offices to have their say.
Supporters of the bill say it is needed to restrict the use of GMO crops, including the seed industry, which they say relies heavily on chemicals and presents risks of cross-pollination of non-transgenic plants.
Making the Big Island a largely GMO-free zone could also bring economic benefits, they say.
Opponents say it would limit the types of crops farmers here can use.
Papaya growers have been the most vocal critics of the legislation.
They believe their industry, which lies heavily on transgenic papaya that is virus resistant, would be harmed by additional regulation and stigmatized by the bill even if they could still grow the modified crop.
The bill needs two votes outside of the committee to be adopted.
Email Tom Callis at email@example.com.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.