County gets good financial marks
By NANCY COOK LAUER
Bond rating agencies have affirmed Hawaii County’s solid financial standing as the county schedules the sale of $97.2 million in bonds.
Ratings agencies Moody’s Investors Service and Fitch Ratings, in statements issued Wednesday, cited the county’s prudent financial management that enabled it to remain on firm fiscal footing during the economic downturn. Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services issued a similarly positive statement the same day, said Finance Director Nancy Crawford. The S&P rating is available only by subscription.
“They all affirmed our current ratings, which we take as a very positive sign given the current economic times,” Crawford said. “We take that as a very positive sign that we’re on the right track.”
The agencies cite the county’s past willingness to raise property taxes when needed, and note the bonds are secured by the full faith and credit of the county, including, as Moody’s describes it, “an unlimited property tax pledge.” That’s because Hawaii County, unlike some other counties in the United States, can raise its property taxes without a referendum or vote by the public.
“Management expects flat (assessed values) in fiscal 2014 and changes to property tax revenues will depend on tax rates approved as part of the budget process,” said the Fitch report.
Does that mean a property tax increase is in the offing?
Crawford said Thursday that the county certainly didn’t indicate that to credit rating agencies, but “we did not close the door on that possibility.”
In the first signal from the county administration that property values are likely to be stagnant for the 2013-14 fiscal year that starts July 1, Crawford said, “We feel like we’ve hit bottom, that we’ve reached a plateau.” Currently, however, the county is focusing on the expense side of the ledger, she said.
The Finance Department will wrap up departmental budget meetings today, and then start crafting the budget Mayor Billy Kenoi will present to the County Council on March 1. The budget is based on a preliminary property tax base. It is then finalized in early May after the property values are certified. The County Council then modifies and approves the budget and sets the property tax rates.
Taxes were last raised in 2010.
Moody’s rated the 2013 series of bonds at AA2, indicating second-highest quality and low credit risk and Fitch gave them an AA- rating, with AAA being the best possible rating.
The bonds are set to be sold through a negotiated sale next week. Almost $40 million of the proceeds are being used to pay off higher-interest 2003 and 2004 bonds, $33 million are paying off bond anticipation notes already borrowed, $9.6 million will pay off state revolving loans and $24.7 million will go toward capital projects, according to the Fitch report.
Deputy Finance Director Deanna Sako said the $24.7 million can be used for any of the projects that have been previously authorized by the County Council. Projects currently in progress or soon to begin include a renovation of Edith Kanakaole Stadium in Hilo, the Laaloa Extension in Kona and the countywide public safety radio upgrade project.
“This rating review by nationally recognized experts is a testament to our careful, conservative approach to balancing the budget in very challenging economic times” Kenoi said in a statement.
Email Nancy Cook Lauer at email@example.com.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.