Geothermal bill evolves
By TOM CALLIS
Tribune-Herald staff writer
Legislation seeking to change regulations regarding geothermal development remains alive though it’s not quite the same bill with which lawmakers started.
House Bill 106 initially sought to repeal Act 97, legislation adopted last year that eliminated geothermal subzones, a land use designation first created when the state began pursuing geothermal development but since seen as too burdensome by state land managers.
Critics of the act, who believe geothermal development should be restricted to designated areas, say it removed too many regulations for tapping into the state’s underground heat sources, including a county permitting process.
The House Committee on Water and Land replaced HB 106 last month with another geothermal bill. The new version also would re-establish the geothermal resource permit process for counties but would not reinstate the subzones.
It also would require a “buffer zone” between new geothermal development and other lands, and assessments for new projects that include environmental and social impacts, and the development’s compatibility with nearby land uses.
The amended version passed the House and will be considered Thursday by the Senate committees on Energy and Environment, Water and Land, and Public Safety, Intergovernmental and Military Affairs.
Former Hawaii County Mayor Harry Kim had been a proponent of the bill’s original version.
Kim said Tuesday that he still supports the reinstatement of the subzones and will attend the hearing Thursday to encourage the committees to put that language back in the bill.
While not opposed to geothermal power, he said he believes Act 97 takes away county “home rule” and should be completely repealed.
“We should go back to the original act that created the development of geothermal for the state of Hawaii,” Kim said.
“I’m not in support of this bill as is.”
Rep. Cindy Evans, D-North Kona, Kohala, is the chair of the House Committee on Water and Land. She couldn’t be reached for comment on the amended version.
In his written testimony, DLNR Chair William Aila said that removal of subzones “reduced a layer of state regulation concerning geothermal development.”
“Eliminating geothermal subzone designation requirements streamlined a portion of the regulatory process and could encourage developers who are ready and willing to help Hawaii meet its clean energy goals,” he said.
Aila also wrote the department is supportive of restoring the counties’ authority to issue geothermal resource permits, which the act removed.
Email Tom Callis at email@example.com.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.