HELCO ordered to cap emissions
By PETER SUR
Tribune-Herald staff writer
Hawaii Electric Light Co. must take measures to cap emissions from three East Hawaii oil-fueled boilers by 2018 to reduce visibility impacts on the state’s two national parks.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency quietly rolled out the rule on Oct. 9, following public hearings on the topic in May and June. As stated in a 30-page final rule in the Federal Register, the EPA issued a final federal implementation plan capping emissions to 3,550 tons of sulfur dioxide per year from HELCO’s Hill, Shipman and Puna power plants.
“If HELCO chooses to meet the cap by switching to cleaner fuel, then the EPA estimates that the costs will be no more than approximately $7.9 million (per) year,” the EPA said. “This cap represents a reduction of 1,400 tons per year of SO2 (sulfur dioxide) from the total projected 2018 annual emissions from these facilities.”
The emissions from the Hill, Shipman and Puna plants totaled 3,209.7 tons in 2011, or 340 tons below the maximum level allowed in 2018. The 1,400-ton reduction is an EPA-generated estimate; HELCO managers say the actual amount could be well below that, given the increased focus on adding renewable generating capacity.
“We’re not even convinced that we’ll be at that 4,900-ton theoretical level if nothing was done,” said Curtis Beck, manager of HELCO’s Energy Services Department. “We might achieve their cap with doing nothing more than what we’re doing now, which is bringing on additional sources of energy.”
The agency also states HELCO can meet the cap and minimize impacts on ratepayers through “the increased use of renewable energy and energy conservation.”
HELCO President Jay Ignacio said in a statement the utility is committed to protecting the environment and supports the EPA’s plan.
“We appreciate the agency’s flexibility and consideration to address electric system reliability and minimize impact to customers, while recognizing our clean energy efforts already under way to achieve emissions reductions,” he said.
Ignacio said HELCO was evaluating the switch from bunker fuel, with its maximum of 2 percent sulfur content, to diesel fuel, which is more expensive but has a sulfur content of no more than 0.4 percent. This is one of many alternatives being considered, he said. The $7.9 million figure represents the cost of switching completely from bunker fuel to diesel fuel.
He also said HELCO will work to “manage costs” that are being incurred as a result of compliance, but the utility “does not anticipate additional costs associated with … compliance in the immediate future.”
The EPA regulations are being implemented to bring Hawaii in compliance with the Clean Air Act, and to make progress toward a nationwide goal of removing any human-generated visibility on what the government terms “Class I areas” — important federal conservation lands, in this case Hawaii Volcanoes National Park and Haleakala National Park — by 2064.
The twist in this case is that Hawaii Volcanoes National Park is home to Kilauea volcano, which is one of the largest single sources of sulfur dioxide in the United States.
The U.S. Geological Survey’s Hawaiian Volcano Observatory estimates that emissions from the lava lake at Halema‘uma‘u crater average 660 tons of sulfur dioxide per day, in addition to the 330 tons of sulfur dioxide emitted from the East Rift Zone, which includes Pu‘u ‘O‘o.
Sulfur dioxide is a major component of both human-caused smog and volcanic vog. Ignacio said HELCO will “continue to work” with EPA and the state Department of Health on the appropriate approach for considering vog in the measuring progress, which was a sticking point during the formulation of the plan.
Ignacio said the emissions cap is not related to the recent release of a geothermal energy request for proposals, nor is it behind HELCO’s plans to invest in biofuel plants like Hu Honua or Aina Koa Pono. The prime motives behind those moves is the reduction in energy costs, in the case of geothermal, and the stabilization of future energy costs, in the case of bioenergy. “Both of these initiatives also have the added benefit of reducing SO2 emissions,” Ignacio said.
Norman Verbanic, manager of HELCO’s Production Department, said the EPA had tasked the states with creating their own implementation plans for improving the visibility in national parks.
“However, Hawaii and 37 other states did not come up with a state implementation plan. As a result of that, the EPA did it for the states.”
One of the options that HELCO is considering to reduce emissions is a retirement of the Shipman power plant on Hilo’s Banyan Drive. It’s mostly offline and operating on a “standby reserve” status, after an expansion of Puna Geothermal Venture’s 8 megawatt generating capacity made Shipman operations less necessary.
Also, HELCO has indicated in its filing with the Public Utilities Commission that after a year or so of operating the Hu Honua biomass plant in Pepeekeo, the Shipman plant would be retired around 2015. Because Hu Honua will not be powered by fossil fuel, the EPA said, it is not subject to the 3,550-ton emissions cap.
Email Peter Sur at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.