Judge backs aerial hunting
By ERIN MILLER
A U.S. District Court in Honolulu ruled Monday Hawaii County’s aerial hunting ban cannot overrule the Department of Land and Natural Resources’ federal mandate to reduce grazing animals in palila habitat on Mauna Kea.
Hawaii County enacted the ordinance banning aerial hunting in 2012, prompting DLNR to end the aerial hunts of feral goats, sheep and cattle on Mauna Kea in the palila habitat. In February, officials with several environmental protection groups learned DLNR had ended the hunts, which were required in a 1998 stipulated order as part of the state’s responsibility to protect the endangered native bird species.
DLNR last month requested an expedited hearing before the U.S. District Court, seeking guidance as to whether DLNR employees or its contractors could be prosecuted by Hawaii County officials for conducting the aerial hunts.
“In short, so long as (DLNR), or their duly-appointed agents, are acting to enforce the specific terms of the 1998 Stipulated Order, they may conduct an aerial sighting over the Palila’s critical habitat and shoot any ungulates sighted without fear of violating (the Hawaii County ordinance),” Judge J. Michael Seabright wrote.
Corporation Counsel Lincoln Ashida said County Council members were advised, before they passed the ordinance, that this could happen.
“I don’t think it took anybody by surprise,” Ashida said.
He saw some positive news in the ruling, in how specific it was in relating the ruling to the 1998 order only.
“The court did not invalidate the entire ordinance,” he said, adding that meant rumored, recent aerial hunts near Kawaihae Road and on Hualalai, would remain illegal.
Tony Sylvester, chairman of the Hawaii County Game Management Advisory Commission, said he was pleased to learn the judge applied his ruling only to the hunts required by the palila protection order.
“It’s kind of a compromise for us,” Sylvester said, adding since 2008, DLNR had conducted four hunts annually, twice the amount required by the 1998 order. “They were getting more and more aggressive. It was an abuse of power already.”
Aerial hunting is a hot topic on Hawaii Island. Environmentalists argue the ungulates are so damaging to native plants — and the plants that house native, endangered bird species — that benefits of using helicopters for aerial eradication outweigh the negative consequences hunters reports. In particular, hunters often cite concerns about the dwindling ungulate population in areas open for hunting, as well as decreasing hunting areas. Hunters also call the aerial hunts wasteful, because the sheep, goat and cattle carcasses are generally left to rot, even though hunters say they would be willing to hike into remote areas to retrieve the meat.
Since 1979, courts have ordered the DLNR to permanently remove the ungulates form the palila’s designated critical habitat. The court ruled that the federal Endangered Species Act trumps the county law.
“There is universal agreement among Hawaii forest bird experts that sheep and goats are the number one threat to the palila’s survival,” Hawaii Audubon Society President Linda Paul said in a written statement Tuesday. “DLNR needs to take immediate, aggressive steps to remove these mammals, or we risk losing the palila forever.”
Earthjustice, the law firm representing the environmental groups, said the palila population has declined 66 percent in the last decade, leaving fewer than 2,200 birds.
Sylvester said that continuing population decline has prompted hunters to question the effectiveness of the aerial hunts. The county’s game management advisory commission will likely call for the DLNR to complete an environmental impact statement for the palila protection measures, including aerial hunting. Sylvester said other factors, including low birth rates, higher birth rates for males than females and cat predation, are having bigger impacts on the palila than ungulates.
Email Erin Miller at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.