Panel amends Banyan Drive legislation
By TOM CALLIS
Tribune-Herald staff writer
Hawaii County could manage but not own the Banyan Drive area and two state parks under legislation amended last week.
Several bills were introduced this legislative session to transfer ownership of the Banyan Drive hotel lands and Hapuna Beach and Mauna Kea state recreation areas to the county.
But the Senate’s Ways and Means Committee on Friday rewrote the bills to allow the county to lease the lands from the state Department of Land and Natural Resources instead.
Sen. Gilbert Kahele, D-Hilo, a committee member, said the bills were amended due to concerns over the legality of transferring the properties since they are ceded lands.
“This way it keeps the discussion going,” he said. “That’s basically where we are at right now.”
In its written testimony, the state Attorney General’s Office said the state could only sell, not simply transfer, the lands to the county.
Any sale would also have to reflect the full value of the properties.
“Because the bills, as currently drafted, do not specify how the transfers are to be made, we raised concerns that the state could be sued for mismanagement of the land of the public land trust,” wrote Deputy Attorney General Daniel Morris.
Revenues from ceded lands are held in trust for public education, the betterment of Native Hawaiians, farm and home ownership, and public use of land.
The state Office of Hawaiian Affairs opposed the proposed transfers since it would reduce revenue for the public land trust. OHA also said the state should maintain ownership of ceded lands until Native Hawaiian claims to them are resolved.
The county has sought to take ownership of the lands, believing it could be a better manager, particularly of the Banyan Drive area, which hosts many of East Hawaii’s hotels.
It’s unclear how a lease agreement — at $1 a year each — would impact the county’s ability to manage the lands or lease agreements with the hotels.
Mayor Billy Kenoi couldn’t be reached for comment by press time Sunday.
The state would still get a share of the revenue from the lands, according to a committee report.
DLNR and the county have discussed transferring ownership of the two recreation areas before but the Legislature intervened in 2011.
It passed a resolution urging those talks to be suspended, noting potential development or management though the Public Land Development Corporation, formed that year.
Email Tom Callis at email@example.com.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.