PUC to hear HELCO requests
By COLIN M. STEWART
Tribune-Herald Staff Writer
The prospect of paying higher electricity rates next year has prompted public opposition to a pair of increase requests from Hawaii Electric Light Co. slated to go before the state Public Utilities Commission.
The PUC is seeking citizen testimony on the requests on Monday and Tuesday in Hilo and Kona, respectively.
At issue are two separate requests from HELCO.
One seeks approval by the PUC of a biodiesel supply contract with Aina Koa Pono-Ka‘u LLC and a related biofuel surcharge to customers to offset the costs brought about by the contract. An Aina Koa refinery in Ka‘u, which has yet to be built, would supply HELCO with approximately 16 million gallons of biodiesel each year for 20 years to fuel its Keahole power plant.
The costs associated with such an agreement, including production, transportation, and storage, would be passed along to consumers in the form of a Biofuel Surcharge Provision, adding between 84 cents and $1 per month to a typical residential customer’s bill.
A similar supply contract was rejected by the PUC in September 2011 due to what regulators called the “excessive” high cost of the fuel.
The second request of the PUC is to approve a 4.2 percent rate increase to fund maintenance of HELCO’s electric grid and system upgrades, as well as the inclusion of more renewable energy technologies. The increase would generate an additional $19.8 million in revenue for HELCO. If the entire amount is approved, it would add $8.32 to a typical, 500-kilowatt-hour monthly electric bill.
HELCO describes the rate increases as necessary to fund increased investment in the safety and reliability of its network, as well as to boost its ability to handle renewable energy sources.
“Nearly 60 percent of our customers’ electric bills go to pay the cost of fuel and purchased power. So it makes sense for HELCO to aggressively pursue renewable energy technologies that are not dependent upon oil and that will reduce the cost of electric service in the long run,” said President Jay Ignacio in a recent HELCO newsletter.
Among the upgrades that HELCO proposes to fund through the 4.2 percent rate increase would be advanced wind forecasting systems, computerized models and tools to analyze integration of customer-supplied solar energy, and enhanced sensors and tools to help system operators manage additional clean energy sources.
But critics say that rate hikes only serve to hurt consumers, and they argue that HELCO could continue to invest in renewable energy while offering lower rates. Among those critics is a group of prominent citizens who make up the Big Island Community Coalition. Steering committee members include former Hawaii Community College Chancellor and current University of Hawaii Vice President for Student Affairs Rockne Freitas, farmer Richard Ha, ‘Imiloa Executive Director Ka‘iu Kimura, Kamehameha Schools-Hawaii High School Principal Lehua Veincent, and rancher H.M. “Monty” Richards, among others.
Through their website, www.bigislandcommunitycoalition.com, and newsletters via email, the group has worked to build public opposition to the requests before the PUC.
“Tell the PUC how rising electricity rates are affecting you and your family. We do not have to accept these rate hikes,” reads a recent email sent to members. “Rising electricity rates act like a giant tax that hurts the most defenseless among us. Seniors on fixed income, single moms, renters, working homeless, and businesses are all hurt by rising electricity rates. Just last month, it was reported that two houses burned down from using candles. One household was using candles for light because they could not afford the electricity bill.”
Coalition members argue that Big Island consumers have borne electricity rates that are 25 percent higher than those paid by Oahu power customers “for as long as anyone can remember,” the mailing states.
“If we were successful in getting the Big Island electricity rate lowest in the state, we would be able to grow and sell more products on Oahu. There would be more jobs here on the Big Island. Instead of leaving for the mainland to find jobs, our children would be able to stay here and work. If we were successful in getting locally produced, lower-cost electricity, our school budget would not rise by 25 percent every two and a half years. That saving would go toward your child’s education instead of oil from a foreign country.”
In a phone interview Tuesday, coalition member Richard Ha said members are encouraging citizens interested in attending the PUC hearings to make a show of solidarity in their opposition to higher electric rates by showing up “in their rubbah slippahs, because that’s the kind of crowd we’re talking about here,” he said.
“Our coalition has been trying to lower electric rates for about two months now,” he said, “and you know something? We haven’t run into one person yet who says, ‘Yeah, I’d like to pay higher rates.’”
Ha argues that by locking itself into a 20-year agreement with Aina Koa Pono at what he estimates to be a cost of $200 per barrel of biodiesel, HELCO is effectively cutting out the possibility of turning to cheaper, better alternatives down the road. The actual cost per barrel as negotiated between Aina Koa Pono and HELCO is confidential and therefore has not been released to the public.
“Geothermal is an alternative at $57 a barrel. And things like ocean thermal is coming, and who knows what else we’ll come up with in the future,” he said.
On Thursday, state Sen. Malama Solomon, D-Waimea, Hamakua, Hilo, chimed in on the proposed HELCO rate increase, pointing to a petition signed by more than 1,000 of her constituents.
In a press release, she said the signatures represented a “clear mandate from her district” to demand that the governor and the PUC deny HELCO’s proposed rate increase, “especially given recent significant profits reported by both HELCO and its parent company …”
She also said she would urge the governor to rescind executive agreements between the state, the U.S. Dept. of Energy and HECO put in place in 2008 by Gov. Linda Lingle.
“These agreements effectively relinquished the State of Hawaii’s control of its energy policy to HECO, and thereby enabled HECO to function as an unregulated monopoly focused on profits for its stockholders rather than stable, lowest-possible-cost electricity for families and businesses of Hawaii,” the release stated.
Meanwhile, Aina Koa Pono is working to provide more information to the public concerning its plans, and to distance itself from HELCO’s planned 4.2 percent rate increase.
In a release issued Tuesday, Aina Koa Pono managing partner Chris Eldridge explained that the 4.2 percent HELCO rate increase “has nothing to do with our project and it is unfortunate for us that the issue is being heard at the same time as ours.”
Eldridge explained that the cost of the biodiesel will be higher “at the outset” than what HELCO pays for imported fossil fuel, but added that world oil prices are expected to climb “well past our cost” in the coming years.
“HELCO estimates that over the life of the contract, its customers will save a half billion dollars by using locally produced fuel,” he wrote. “That is an average of about $1,300 per electric customer.”
Eldridge pointed to additional benefits, such as nearly $200 million in general excise and payroll taxes over the contract life, and a boost to the job market.
“AKP’s Ka‘u operation will require 400 construction workers — adding 13 percent to current sector jobs — and 200 permanent jobs,” he wrote. “… We intend to be good neighbors.”
For more information from the Big Island Community Coalition, email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Email Colin M. Stewart at email@example.com.
IF YOU GO:
Public Utilities Commission hearings concerning requests by Hawaii Electric Light Company Inc. and Hawaiian Electric Company Inc.
• Monday, 6 p.m.
Hilo High School cafeteria
556 Waianuenue Avenue
• Tuesday, 6 p.m.
Kealakehe High School cafeteria
74-5000 Puohulihuli St.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.