Spaceport idea faces hurdles
By ERIN MILLER
Government officials have been eyeing Ka‘u for a spaceport as far back as the 1960s.
But the latest proposal — revealed by Rep. Cindy Evans, D-North Kona, Kohala, at a community meeting last week — may be a hard sell, particularly in a county where the top executive wrote the legal brief that brought down the last spaceport plan.
“I’m supportive of astronomy, the University of Hawaii, new science technology,” Mayor Billy Kenoi said Tuesday. “We’re far, far away from any approvals” to allow satellite or rocket launching here, though.
Kenoi learned of the most recent proposal when Stephens Media reported on it last week. No one has approached county officials with any information, he added. Evans, at the community meeting, said she couldn’t remember who had brought the idea to the state’s Office of Aerospace Development, within the Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism. A message left with the Aerospace Development office was not returned Tuesday. Evans also did not respond to a message late Tuesday.
Kenoi, in 1994 a student at the University of Hawaii’s William S. Richardson School of Law, joined in the fight against C. Brewer and Co.’s proposed satellite launching facility on 500 acres in Ka‘u. Former Gov. John Waihee, who had been a proponent of the project since C. Brewer owner J.W.A. “Doc” Buyers made the proposal in 1986, had accepted the project’s environmental impact statement in December 1993, his last month in office, Kenoi said.
“The issue was that the EIS, done by CH2M Hill, was insufficient, inadequate,” Kenoi said. It failed to consider all the potential adverse impacts.”
Kenoi didn’t say he outright opposed a new spaceport proposal. Technological improvements and more awareness of, and mitigation of, cultural and environmental impacts could make for a viable proposal, he said. But without seeing a proposal, just hearing someone is talking about a spaceport “raises more questions than it answers.”
Buyers’ proposal stayed in circulation for six years, during which time the state spent more than $1 million studying it. The County Council swung back and forth between support and opposition. Business groups testified in favor of it, claiming it would be a boon to Ka‘u’s economy. Ka‘u residents disagreed and argued against it.
Late in the process, a state document revealed the expected profit would be about $7.7 million a year, a figure at least one state senator at the time said wasn’t sufficient to offset all the possible environmental and cultural impacts.
Buyers wasn’t the first person to propose launching items into space from South Point.
A 1961 joint NASA-Department of Defense report called for the federal government to acquire land, from Ka Lae to Mahuka Bay, for a satellite launching site, according to a 1987 West Hawaii Today article. Among the many advantages listed for South Point was that “operations can be carried out with relative secrecy.”
Other arguments in favor of South Point, the report said, was the ability to launch over the water.
Former astronaut Donald “Deke” Slayton tried, from 1982 to 1983, to build support for a spaceport in South Point as well. Slayton eventually returned to Hawaii Island in the late 1980s, as an unofficial consultant to C. Brewer.
County approvals and a state environmental review aren’t the only hurdles to opening a spaceport. The Federal Aviation Administration requires a license to launch rockets. The project would need to complete federal environmental studies, too.
Email Erin Miller at email@example.com.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.