Navy rejects proposals for protecting whales
SANTA ANA, Calif. — The Navy has rejected suggestions by the California Coastal Commission to limit sonar training to avoid harming whales and other marine mammals but talks were continuing to resolve the issue.
Navy officials said in a July 31 letter that they would not adopt the commission’s March recommendations, the Orange County Register reported on Monday.
“We’re still working with them,” said Mark Delaplaine, a coastal manager with the commission. “At some point, the clock is going to run out and we’ll have to have a response if we haven’t come to an agreement.”
The Navy is expected to ramp up its sonar and underwater explosives training in the waters off Southern California and Hawaii beginning next year as the war in Afghanistan winds down and the military shifts its focus to the Pacific.
The commission, which examined the training plan for the period between 2014 and 2019, wants the Navy to create safety zones that would guarantee no high-intensity sonar activity near marine sanctuaries and protected areas, and in spots that experience a high seasonal concentration of blue, fin and gray whales.
The commission ruled in March that the Navy lacked enough information to back up its argument that the threat to marine mammals would be negligible.
The Navy has estimated 130 marine mammals could die and another 1,600 could suffer hearing loss during the training program, which plans annually for more than 50,000 underwater explosions and more than 10,000 hours of high-intensity sonar use.
“The Navy has been training and testing in that area for decades without major harm to marine life there,” a Navy statement said Monday.
If no agreement is reached, the Navy could simply choose to proceed with the training, as it did after the commission requested additional protections in 2007 and 2009.
The commission could sue to try to force the Navy to adopt the measures, as it has done in the past but unsuccessfully.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.