Hawaii House to debate reapportionment reform
By ANITA HOFSCHNEIDER
HONOLULU — The state House Judiciary Committee is planning to consider a bill today to include all military members when breaking down how Hawaii’s Senate and House seats are distributed.
The bill addresses a longstanding controversy over the process known as reapportionment. Reapportionment Project Manager David Rosenbrock says students and military members who haven’t declared Hawaii residency aren’t counted when determining district representation. The result was that in 2011, more than 100,000 people were excluded.
A lawsuit on the issue is pending before federal court.
Supporters of the bill say existing state law disenfranchises service members in Hawaii and that reapportionment should be based on U.S. Census figures. They say Hawaii is the only state that doesn’t consider military personnel when calculating district representation.
Sen. Sam Slom, the Senate’s only Republican member who sponsored the bill, says it’s an issue of equal rights.
“Everyone is talking about equality nowadays, but apparently it doesn’t apply to the military, and I think that’s outrageous,” Slom told The Associated Press.
But opponents worry about whether including nonresident military personnel would result in less representation for Neighbor Islands. The majority of the state’s military presence is concentrated on Oahu, which already has the lion’s share of representation in the Legislature.
The state Senate has 25 members, with 17 representing Oahu and eight from neighbor islands. Of the House’s 51 members, 35 are from Oahu and 16 represent neighbor islands.
Sen. Malama Solomon from the Big Island was the only lawmaker to oppose the bill last week when the Senate voted to send the measure to the House.
Solomon was one of several plaintiffs who successfully sued the state after the 2011 Reapportionment Commission sought to include all military service members in its reapportionment plan, which would have moved a Senate seat from the Big Island to Oahu. The Hawaii Supreme Court invalidated the plan last year and ruled that the state constitution limits consideration to permanent residents.
The state attorney general’s office says it has concerns about Slom’s bill, and the state would need to adopt a constitutional amendment in order to include nonresident service members in the reapportionment process.
But Slom says he is confident that his proposal does the right thing both morally and legally.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.