Hawaii news coalition: Senate killed shield law
By ANITA HOFSCHNEIDER
HONOLULU — A coalition of Hawaii news media is blaming the state Senate for failing to extend a journalism shield law past its expiration on June 30.
In particular, they’re blaming Sen. Clayton Hee.
“The way one man — one man — could dictate the demise of the shield law is something that should concern the entire public,” Jeff Portnoy, an attorney representing the Hawaii Shield Law Coalition, said at a press conference on Wednesday. The group includes more than 20 organizations including the Society of Professional Journalists and the Associated Press. “It may be the shield law this time, but it could be another important piece of legislation the next time.”
The senator from Kaneohe was not immediately available for comment.
The law protecting journalists from revealing their sources and notes became the subject of a political showdown this week after lawmakers disagreed about proposed changes.
A bill to extend the law but limit its scope was up for a vote in both chambers on Tuesday. At the last minute, the House adopted an amendment that deleted the changes both chambers negotiated last week.
Hee, chairman of the powerful Senate Judiciary and Labor Committee, was the man behind the changes. He wanted to limit protections for all journalists and exclude those who work for digital newspapers and free publications.
Hee has previously said that he wants to clarify the existing law. He said his changes are based on advice from the attorney general’s office. The senator has also criticized online media for false and mean-spirited reporting, and in one hearing distributed copies of the 1948 Chicago Tribune front-page headline “Dewey Defeats Truman,” referencing one of journalism’s most famous instances of getting the news wrong.
Rather than go along with Hee’s changes, the House amended the bill Tuesday to extend the shield law for two more years, promising to study the issue further with a task force.
House Majority Leader Scott Saiki told The Associated Press that the amendment was a last-minute decision but he had hoped the Senate would follow suit.
Hours later, a divided Senate passed its version of the bill without responding to the House amendment.
Saiki said Wednesday that the bill is dead because of the House and Senate disagreement.
Portnoy says the news media coalition favored making the current law permanent without any changes beyond removing a sunset provision. It also preferred the two-year House extension over the Senate version.
Sen. Les Ihara was one of nine senators who voted against the Senate proposal. He said he supports the existing shield law but he didn’t have enough votes to introduce an amendment.
Ihara says the House killed the bill by introducing an amendment without coordinating with the Senate.
Sen. Sam Slom says it’s possible the measure could be revived before the Legislature ends its 2013 session on Thursday.
“It’s not over until it’s over,” he said.
But with one day left, the prospect looks unlikely. Saiki says he hopes the bill’s death will allow the Legislature go back to the drawing board and come up with a proposal everyone can support. But Portnoy said he doesn’t see the point of returning to the Legislature next year to advocate for the bill if Hee remains in power.
“When the Senate chair holds up ‘Dewey Defeats Truman’ as an example of what journalism is, you know that you don’t have a chance,” he said.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.