Officer abuse case dropped
WAILUKU, Maui — A criminal complaint against a former police officer was dismissed because the time limit for a speedy trial lapsed when the document went missing for months after being received at the Maui Police Department.
Christopher Keoloha, 28, was accused of abusing his wife last November. The document in Keoloha’s case was received by the Maui Police Department in February but went missing for months before a second copy was sent and processed.
Keoloha was arraigned on Aug. 7 on allegations that he abused his wife Rachel, also a police officer with the department.
The charge was dismissed Friday because the 180-day time limit for a speedy trial had lapsed by the time Kealoha was arraigned. Second Circuit Judge Richard Bissen cited the “unusual occurrence” that led to the delay and dismissed the charge without prejudice, meaning it can be brought again.
Deputy Prosecutor Emlyn Higa said that the state would refile the charge alleging that Kealoha abused his wife at their Haiku residence on Nov. 24.
In a tape of her 911 call played in court on Friday, Rachel Keoloha says, “Chris just kicked me in the face.”
Lt. Arthur Dadez, a nearly 27-year police veteran and the Wailuku Patrol District watch commander, testified that he was assigned to find the complaint against Kealoha on July 18, after an internal inquiry about whether it had been served.
When he couldn’t locate the document, he asked the prosecutor’s office to send him another copy, which he received the same day. He assigned his watch to serve the summons on Kealoha. Court records show that it was served that same day.
Police records show the original document from the prosecutor’s office was received at the Police Department’s Records Section on Feb. 1.
On Jan. 17, about a week before the complaint was filed, Rachel Kealoha had gone to the prosecutor’s office to sign a document requesting that her husband not be prosecuted. She was told that the prosecutor’s office might proceed with the charge.
Dadez said in his more than 26 years he had never seen a summons go missing. Even if it was placed in the wrong bin, it would be returned to the correct bin or sent somewhere that could be tracked.
“So how do you explain a physical document going from the prosecutor’s office to the Police Department and then totally disappearing?” Bissen asked.
“It got intercepted,” Dadez said. “Somebody picked it up and made it go away.”
Kealoha resigned from the department earlier this year.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.