UH: Gay marriage worth $217M in tourism
By OSKAR GARCIA
HONOLULU — A new economic analysis from the University of Hawaii says legalizing gay marriage in the state would boost tourism by $217 million over the next three years.
The study from the university’s Economic Research Organization says that would boost state and local general excise tax revenues by $10.2 million from 2014 through 2016.
Previous estimates on the effect gay marriage would have on tourism were less specific because two U.S. Supreme Court cases were pending.
The study’s author, professor Sumner LaCroix, said the recent decisions that affirmed federal benefits for married same-sex couples and rejected a law that halted gay marriages in California now give a clearer picture, but the issue is time sensitive because of pent-up demand for same-sex marriage.
“If Hawaii waits to adopt same-sex marriage, it will not realize these gains,” LaCroix said in the analysis. “They will be lost forever, diverted to other states that recognize marriage equality.”
Since the Supreme Court rulings last month, advocates of gay marriage have been pushing for a special session in Hawaii to push for more than the civil union law that is already in place. But legislators from the House and Senate told the Honolulu Star-Advertiser this week they don’t have the two-thirds support needed to call themselves back into session, and Gov. Neil Abercrombie has not signaled whether he will call for a special session on his own.
A proposed constitutional amendment died in committee in the House earlier this year, while a Senate resolution passed asking for more study on the issue.
The Legislature reconvenes its regular session in January.
Most of the added visitor spending would come from couples from other U.S. states that have legalized gay marriage who might plan a destination wedding or honeymoon in Hawaii, LaCroix said. He estimated $166 million would be spent on marriage ceremonies and honeymoons.
LaCroix said nearly 2,000 same-sex couples living in Hawaii could be married by the end of 2016.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.