UK surveillance plan under fire
LONDON — British lawmakers on Tuesday demanded the government water down plans to keep track of phone calls, email and Internet activity — a bill critics dub a “snooper’s charter.”
The Communications Data Bill would force telecoms service providers to retain for a year records of all phone and email traffic and website visits, though not the content of calls and messages.
The data on billions of emails, tweets, texts, calls and Internet hits would be available to police forces, the National Crime Agency and the revenue and customs service. The bill as it stands gives the government the power to extend that access to other agencies.
Home Secretary Theresa May has called the proposals “sensible and limited” measures to prevent crime and terrorism.
But an all-party parliamentary committee scrutinizing the legislation said the draft bill was “overkill and … much wider than the specific needs identified by the law enforcement agencies.”
The committee said the bill would give the home secretary — Britain’s interior minister — powers to order communications companies to disclose “potentially limitless categories of data.”
“There is a fine but crucial line between allowing our law enforcement and security agencies’ access to the information they need to protect the country, and allowing our citizens to go about their daily business without a fear, however unjustified, that the state is monitoring their every move,” said the committee’s chair, Conservative peer David Maclean.
The proposals have split Britain’s coalition government, which contains both law-and-order minded Conservatives and members of the Liberal Democrats, who campaigned on a promise to curb government intrusion and protect civil liberties.
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, leader of the Liberal Democrats, said the law required a “fundamental rethink.”
“We cannot proceed with this bill and we have to go back to the drawing board,” he said.
Security Minister James Brokenshire, a Conservative, said the government would amend the legislation in an attempt to get it through Parliament.
“We know that there is work that needs to be done and I absolutely accept that,” he told BBC radio.
Rules for posting comments
Comments posted below are from readers. In no way do they represent the view of Oahu Publishing Inc. or this newspaper. This is a public forum.
Comments may be monitored for inappropriate content but the newspaper is under no obligation to do so. Comment posters are solely responsible under the Communications Decency Act for comments posted on this Web site. Oahu Publishing Inc. is not liable for messages from third parties.
IP and email addresses of persons who post are not treated as confidential records and will be disclosed in response to valid legal process.
Do not post:
- Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
- Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
- Copyrighted materials of any sort without the express permission of the copyright holder.
- Personal attacks, insults or threats.
- The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
- Comments unrelated to the story.
If you believe that a commenter has not followed these guidelines, please click the FLAG icon below the comment.