Texas Congressman Jeb Hensarling is not a fan of the 2010 Dodd-Frank law, the massive banking legislation passed in the wake of the financial crisis. He thinks it has slowed the U.S. economy by burdening small banks and credit unions with costly regulations that have choked off lending to the small businesses that create most of the nation’s jobs.
Texas Congressman Jeb Hensarling is not a fan of the 2010 Dodd-Frank law, the massive banking legislation passed in the wake of the financial crisis. He thinks it has slowed the U.S. economy by burdening small banks and credit unions with costly regulations that have choked off lending to the small businesses that create most of the nation’s jobs.
Hensarling says Dodd-Frank also is the reason one out of five credit-worthy borrowers in 2010 cannot qualify for a loan today, and why banks raised fees to the point that a rising number of Americans can no longer afford to maintain a bank account. Before Dodd-Frank, 75 percent of banks offered free checking. Half of those now charge fees.
This is no boon to the consumer, despite the law’s creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that Hensarling calls “the single most powerful and least accountable federal agency” in the government. He’s backed up in that by a federal appeals court, which ruled in October that the structure of the agency is unconstitutional. It is run by a single director, appointed by the president, who can’t be fired without “cause.”
In September, Hensarling, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, introduced the Financial CHOICE Act, a bill that would restructure the CFPB, replacing its unaccountable director with a bipartisan five-member commission and putting its budget, currently funded by the Federal Reserve, under the control of Congress. The bill also would release smaller banks from the regulations passed for big banks.
Even one of the men whose name is on the Dodd-Frank law, former Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank, admitted recently that it was “a mistake” to apply the extra supervision required by the law to smaller banks, those with $50 billion in assets. Frank now says the threshold should have been much higher, $125 billion or more.
In September, the Financial CHOICE Act faced a certain veto from the White House, but it has received a warmer welcome at Trump Tower. Financial reform should be a bipartisan priority. There’s no reason to preserve the errors in legislation passed under pressure six years ago.
— The Orange County Register