It is not surprising but it is deeply depressing that the Trump administration is reviving the “global gag rule” — so called because it bans U.S. financial assistance to nongovernmental health care organizations in foreign countries if they provide abortions
It is not surprising but it is deeply depressing that the Trump administration is reviving the “global gag rule” — so called because it bans U.S. financial assistance to nongovernmental health care organizations in foreign countries if they provide abortions or even utter the word to their patients in counseling them or referring them elsewhere.
The rule was first put into place during the Reagan administration and since then has been repealed and revived alternately by Democratic and Republican administrations, including former President Barack Obama’s.
The rule was bad enough in its earlier form, when it barred aid to family planning organizations that offered abortion or abortion counseling. The last time it was in place, during the George W. Bush administration, family planning organizations receiving $600 million in funding were affected.
But the new Trump administration incarnation of the rule is far more expansive. Instead of applying specifically to family planning programs, it will now cover approximately $8.8 billion in funds given out to health care providers of all sorts through the State Department, the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Defense Department. Health care providers overseas working in HIV/AIDS, maternal and child health, malaria, global health security and other fields will be required to sign the agreement. And many of those providers also offer abortion or abortion counseling.
The rule creates particular problems for health care providers treating people with HIV and AIDS. Signing the agreement would mean, for example, never being able to give a pregnant woman infected with HIV counseling on abortion.
State Department officials say the gag rule is necessary to ensure U.S. tax dollars do not support foreign organizations that “perform or actively promote abortion as a method of family planning.”
But there is already a law in place that prohibits the use of U.S. funds for abortions. So the gag rule is not necessary for that. It’s just a way to pressure organizations that provide abortions or abortion counseling.
Worse yet, the rule threatens to cripple the provision of health care to underserved, wretchedly poor parts of the world. Most of the funding for HIV and AIDS assistance as well as maternal care and family planning now goes to about 30 African countries.
For health care organizations to stop providing abortions would be neither easy nor the right thing to do. In many places, one clinic serves multiple functions — taking care of women and children, treating HIV, testing for sexually transmitted diseases, offering family planning and contraceptives and sometimes abortions or abortion counseling — all extremely important functions.
In some countries, particularly in Africa, a legal abortion can mean life or death for a woman who gets pregnant unintentionally. If she can’t get a legal, safe abortion, she may opt for an illegal, dangerous one. …
In the end, it’s possible this policy will result in more abortions, not fewer. Stanford University researchers found that abortions significantly increased in Africa when the gag rule was in effect during the George W. Bush administration, perhaps because of lost funding for programs offering contraceptives and family planning counseling.
The global gag rule will hamper the delivery of desperately needed health care in the developing world. If the administration truly cares about protecting life, it should scrap this policy immediately.
— Los Angeles Times
