SAN FRANCISCO — A federal appeals court on Friday dismissed Hawaii’s attempt to challenge the rules created by the Trump administration for its travel ban on citizens from six majority-Muslim countries. ADVERTISING SAN FRANCISCO — A federal appeals court on
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal appeals court on Friday dismissed Hawaii’s attempt to challenge the rules created by the Trump administration for its travel ban on citizens from six majority-Muslim countries.
The state asked the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for an order saying the government could not omit grandparents, aunts and uncles, and other relatives of someone in the U.S. from the list of people who can still travel to the country.
A three-judge panel said the 9th Circuit does not have jurisdiction to address the issue after the state appealed a federal judge’s decision to leave the government’s rules in place.
U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson on Thursday denied Hawaii’s request to clarify who is exempt, saying the question would be better posed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Watson put President Donald Trump’s revised travel ban on hold in March, and the justices partially reinstated it last month.
“Every day that passes is a day when our government is turning away human beings — from newborn children to elderly grandparents — whom the injunction requires to be admitted,” attorneys for Hawaii said in their filing with the 9th Circuit.
The 9th Circuit panel noted that Watson may not have authority to clarify the Supreme Court ruling. But he can interpret and enforce it.
That appeared to give Hawaii an opportunity to reframe its request to Watson.
It wasn’t immediately clear what Hawaii will do next. “We appreciate the 9th Circuit for ruling so quickly and will comply,” state Attorney General Doug Chin said in a statement.
The Supreme Court said the president’s 90-day ban on visitors from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen could be enforced pending arguments set for October if a visitor lacks a “credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.”
The court’s majority said a close family relationship in the U.S. was required to enter the country and a spouse or mother-in-law would clearly be permitted.
The Trump administration has said the exemption would apply to parents, spouses, sons, daughters, sons-in-law, daughters-in-law, fiances or siblings.
A U.S. Department of Justice spokeswoman said the agency declined to comment on the 9th Circuit’s decision. The department said in a court filing that its list of people exempt from the ban “hews closely” to categories defined by Congress.
