TMT opponents appeal project bond ruling
HONOLULU — Opponents of the Thirty Meter Telescope filed an appeal of a court ruling rejecting their argument that the project requires a substantial security bond before beginning construction.
The lawsuit filed by the Mauna Kea Hui coalition was dismissed in August by Hilo Circuit Judge Greg Nakamura.
Mauna Kea Hui appealed partially because the bond issue was not fully heard during a contested case hearing, coalition leader Kealoha Pisciotta said.
Hearing officer Riki May Amano unilaterally dismissed the topic without allowing arguments, Pisciotta said.
The appeal, filed last month by Big Island attorney Gary Zamber on behalf of Pisciotta and others, said the Mauna Kea Plan of 1977 requires every development to have a security bond equaling the project’s full cost.
The performance bond for the Thirty Meter Telescope International Observatory was essentially litigated during the project’s contested case hearing, Nakamura’s ruling said.
Telescope project attorney Douglas Ing said the lawsuit’s claim is weak.
“Judge Nakamura quickly and summarily dismissed the hui’s complaint and claims based on TIO’s motion,” Ing said last week.
The original claim rejected by Nakamura’s ruling sought an injunction and asked the court to rescind the project’s right to begin construction, arguing the failure to post a bond would impose onerous financial liability on state residents.
The observatory board does not have the necessary funding to finish the project, estimated to cost $2.4 billion following more than five years of protest and delays, Pisciotta said.
Project officials acknowledged before a National Academy of Sciences committee last week that they are hundreds of millions of dollars short.
Defendants named in the lawsuit include the observatory, Gov. David Ige, state Attorney General Clare Connors, state Land Board Chairwoman Suzanne Case, Hawaii County Mayor Harry Kim and University of Hawaii President David Lassner.
Building owners locked in tense renovation dispute
HONOLULU — The owners of adjacent Honolulu buildings are embroiled in a dispute over renovation work that involved alleged property damage, personal safety hazards and a requested court injunction.
A vacant, 12-story tower, formally known as the Queen Emma Building, is being converted to 71 rental apartments for low-income households.
The conversion, estimated at about $25 million, began in October and includes cutting window openings in the tower.
The work has drawn complaints from Joseph Pickard, the owner of a three-story building sitting within inches of the tower.
The tower development partnership, Queen Emma Partners LP, filed a motion in state circuit court last week seeking an injunction to prevent Pickard from interfering with renovation work.
Pickard said he does not think a wooden canopy and netting to protect the smaller building from falling debris are sufficient safety measures.
