After whistle hastens Samford’s exit from March Madness, the referee could be next

SALT LAKE CITY — The referee who blew the critical whistle that worked against Samford at the end of its loss to Kansas in the NCAA Tournament might be following the Bulldogs straight out of town.

It is routine for evaluators to analyze games and decide which officials move on to call the next round. The NCAA said it does not comment on judgment calls, meaning one way to determine its take on the end of the Kansas 93-89 win might be to see if referee Lamar Simpson is assigned to either of Saturday’s games in Salt Lake City.

Simpson was behind the play with 14.7 seconds left Thursday night when Samford’s A.J. Staton-McCray caught up to Nicolas Timberlake and blocked his layup from behind.

Simpson called a foul, leading to two free throws that gave KU a three-point lead. Replays from a number of angles showed no contact on the play that sent Timberlake crashing to the floor.

Former referee John Clougherty, who worked in 12 Final Fours before becoming supervisor of refs in the Atlantic Coast and other conferences, told AP he did not see the play and didn’t want to specifically comment on it. He said it’s not uncommon for an official to come to a site assigned to work two games but have the assignment switched if the first game goes poorly.

“We’re talking about last plays that are deciding games, not an incorrect travel call or something like that,” Clougherty said. “I don’t want to call it discipline, but when his evaluation comes down, he might not get that second game.”

Clougherty said a rule he has always held to over decades of officiating is to err on the side of not making a call.

“The mindset is always, when I blow the whistle, I want to be able to justify the contact,” he said. “You have to be on the side of, let’s make our no-calls our mistakes. Not the one where you blow the whistle and the replay embarrasses us because there’s nothing there.”

The call brought with it the issue of whether the NCAA should expand a replay system that currently doesn’t allow review of judgment calls on the sort of last-second foul that helped decide Thursday’s game. The AP asked a handful of coaches around the country about it Friday:

— Creighton’s Greg McDermott said he worries about too many replays slowing down the games. “I would probably want to talk to the NBA guys” to see how they like the rule in their league that allows for coaches’ challenges, he said.

— Illinois’ Brad Underwood said he wishes coaches could challenge in college. Regrading the Samford call, he said, “It was a tough play, and you kind of live with the outcome.”

— Arizona’s Tommy Lloyd: “Listen, I think we’ve got to be open to” coach-initiated reviews. “At the end of the day, the number one deal is, get the calls right.”

College basketball does allow for reviews of some plays, including buzzer-beaters and shot-clock issues, shooters stepping on or behind the 3-point line, reviews to see if flagrant fouls were committed and out of bounds plays in the last two minutes.

But on the biggest play of Thursday’s game, there was no recourse.

Afterward, Timberlake insisted he had been fouled. Staton-McCray disagreed and said if there was a foul, “I guess Casper hit him.”