Judge to weigh future of Trump prosecution over 2020 election

An undated photo provided by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts shows U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan. The judge overseeing former President Donald Trump’s trial on charges of seeking to overturn the 2020 election denied on Wednesday, Sept. 27, 2023, his attempt to disqualify her from the case for supposedly being biased against him. (Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts via The New York Times) — NO SALES; EDITORIAL USE ONLY —

WASHINGTON — A federal judge is set to weigh Thursday whether former President Donald Trump, in the critical weeks leading up to the November election, will face court fights over the Washington-based criminal case about his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss.

Judge Tanya S. Chutkan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia will hold a status conference and plans to set the next phase of special counsel John L. “Jack” Smith’s effort to prosecute Trump for crimes connected to the effort to disrupt the transfer of power in 2021.

ADVERTISING


Chutkan set the hearing following the Supreme Court decision in July that gave presidents “absolute immunity” around the core of their presidential powers and possible immunity outside of that. The justices sent the case back to the district court for further proceedings.

Smith has since filed a slimmed-down indictment of Trump that excluded a portion of the allegations that the Supreme Court ruled could not be charged. Trump’s legal team has argued those changes were not enough and the remaining allegations should be considered immune as well.

In a joint filing with Trump’s team late Friday, Smith’s team said it wanted to litigate Trump’s immunity claims “first and foremost” but left the trial schedule, and whether to address Trump’s other efforts to jettison the case at the same time, up to Chutkan.

“The Court’s decisions on how to manage its docket are firmly within its discretion,” Smith’s team wrote.

In that same filing, Trump’s attorneys proposed a schedule that would see much of the court fight delayed until after the November election. Trump’s team also said it intended to build on the Supreme Court ruling and try to dismiss the case outright.

“If the Court determines, as it should, that the Special Counsel cannot rebut the presumption that these acts are immune, binding law requires that the entire indictment be dismissed because the grand jury considered immunized evidence,” Friday’s filing said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Star-Advertiser's TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email hawaiiwarriorworld@staradvertiser.com.