By RAYMOND ZHONG NYTimes News Service
Share this story

Kelly Brunt wasn’t the only federal employee to be laid off this month while traveling for work. But she was almost certainly the only one whose work trip was in Antarctica.

Brunt was a program director at the National Science Foundation, the $9 billion agency that supports scientific advancement in practically every field apart from medicine. As part of the Trump administration’s campaign to shrink the federal government, roughly 10% of the foundation’s 1,450 career employees lost their jobs last week. Officials told staff members that layoffs were just getting started.

ADVERTISING

Yet the office where Brunt worked has an importance that goes beyond science.

The Office of Polar Programs coordinates research in the Arctic and Antarctic, where the fragile, fast-changing environments are of growing strategic interest to the world’s superpowers.

By treaty, Antarctica is a scientific preserve. And for decades, U.S. research — plus the three year-round stations, the aircraft and the ships that support it — has been the bedrock of the country’s presence there.

Of late, though, “countries such as Korea and China have been rapidly expanding their presence, while the U.S. has been sort of maintaining the status quo,” said Julia Wellner, a marine scientist at the University of Houston who studies Antarctic glaciers.

The Office of Polar Programs has long been understaffed, said Michael Jackson, who worked as an Antarctic program director for the agency until retiring late last year. Aging planes and facilities, plus flat budgets for science, have snarled the pace of research. “Right now we are capable of doing maybe 60% of the science that we were capable of doing” 15 years ago, Jackson said.

If the Trump administration slashes science funding, American researchers could collaborate more with other nations’ polar institutes, as many already do, Wellner said. “But those other countries have their own scientists,” she said. “I don’t think South Korea or the U.K. is just going to make room for all of us.”

When asked how the layoffs of polar scientists would affect the National Science Foundation’s work, an agency representative declined to comment.

When the agency fired Brunt and other employees last week, she was heading home after spending over a month at McMurdo Station in Antarctica. Another program director who was laid off, David Porter, had been supporting scientists embarking from New Zealand on a 10-week expedition in the Southern Ocean. Other teams were gearing up to drill ice cores, take seismic measurements, measure ultraviolet radiation and more.

Foundation program officers help decide which projects like these are most worthy of federal funding. Often they are seasoned scientists themselves: Porter is an expert in atmospheric and oceanic science who has worked at Columbia University.

Brunt’s NSF employment was probationary because she became a permanent worker only six months ago, she said. Before that, she spent three years at the agency on temporary assignment from NASA and the University of Maryland. In total, she has 25 years of experience as a glaciologist and 15 Antarctic field seasons under her belt.

“I want to dispel this rumor that this is a bunch of people who are sitting around sucking off the government milk bottle,” Jackson said. “These are people that had well-established careers in academia, and they decided that they wanted to come to NSF and give something back to the U.S. taxpayers.”

Jackson also doesn’t buy the idea that eliminating federal workers will root out fraud and abuse. “By removing the program officers at the front lines, you’re actually removing the very thing that you want to have there in place to make sure that no fraud and abuse is happening,” he said.

For scientists in the field, their program officer might also be their first point of contact when issues arise, said Twila Moon, the deputy lead scientist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colorado.

© 2025 The New York Times Company