Judge stops Musk’s team from accessing millions of Americans’ data, cites privacy breach

Subscribe Now Choose a package that suits your preferences.
Start Free Account Get access to 7 premium stories every month for FREE!
Already a Subscriber? Current print subscriber? Activate your complimentary Digital account.

A federal judge said on Thursday the Social Security Administration likely violated privacy laws by giving tech billionaire Elon Musk’s aides “unbridled access” to millions of Americans’ private data, and ordered a halt to any further record sharing.

U.S. District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander of Maryland said Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency was intruding into “the personal affairs of millions of Americans” as part of its hunt for fraud and waste under President Donald Trump.

“To be sure, rooting out possible fraud, waste, and mismanagement in the SSA is in the public interest. But, that does not mean that the government can flout the law to do so,” Hollander said.

The case has shed light for the first time on the amount of personal information that DOGE staffers have been given access to in the databases, which hold vast amounts of sensitive information on most Americans.

One of the systems accessed is called Numident, or Numerical Identification, known inside the agency as the “crown jewels,” three former and current SSA staffers told Reuters. It contains personal information of everyone who has applied for or been given a social security number since the agency was founded in the 1930s.

DOGE did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

A White House spokesman criticized the decision in a statement and said Trump will “continue to seek all legal remedies available to ensure the will of the American people goes into effect.”

“This is yet another activist judge abusing the judicial system to try and sabotage the President’s attempts to rid the government of waste, fraud, and abuse,” spokesman Harrison Fields said.

The two labor unions and an advocacy group that sued SSA, Musk, DOGE and others, claimed in their lawsuit the agency had been “ransacked” and that DOGE members had been installed without proper vetting or training, and demanded access to some of the agency’s most sensitive data systems.

The lawsuit was brought by the advocacy group Democracy Forward.