WASHINGTON — In an Oval Office meeting with President Donald Trump on Monday, President Nayib Bukele of El Salvador said that he would not return a Maryland man who was wrongly deported from the United States and sent to a notorious Salvadoran prison.
Bukele, who has positioned himself as a key ally to Trump, in part by opening his country’s prisons to deportees, sat next to the president and a group of Cabinet officials who struck a combative tone over the case, which has reached the Supreme Court.
“Of course I’m not going to do it,” Bukele said when reporters asked if he was willing to help return the man, Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, a 29-year-old father of three who was deported last month. The Trump administration has acknowledged that his deportation was the result of an “administrative error.”
The message from the meeting was clear: Neither Trump nor Bukele had any intention of returning Abrego Garcia, even though the Supreme Court has ruled that he should come back to the United States. The case has come to symbolize Trump’s defiance of the courts and his willingness to deport people without due process.
Trump also mused about the possibility of sending American citizens convicted of violent crimes to prison in El Salvador, although he said Attorney General Pam Bondi was still studying the legality of the proposal.
“If it’s a homegrown criminal, I have no problem, no,” Trump said. “I’m talking about violent people. I’m talking about really bad people.”
Before the full group of reporters was allowed into the Oval Office for the meeting, television cameras captured Trump telling Bukele to build more prisons.
Trump invited some of his top officials to Monday’s meeting, much of which was held in front of news cameras. Bondi and Stephen Miller, who is the architect of Trump’s immigration agenda, accused Abrego Garcia of being a member of the MS-13 gang.
Abrego Garcia has never been charged with or convicted of being in a gang. In 2011, Abrego Garcia’s lawyers say, he fled threats and violence in El Salvador and came to the United States illegally to join his brother, a U.S. citizen, in Maryland. He later married an American citizen. In 2019, an immigration judge prohibited the United States from deporting him to El Salvador, saying he might face violence or torture there.
Abrego Garcia’s lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
“That’s up to El Salvador if they want to return him,” Bondi said. “That’s not up to us.”
Miller went further, arguing that a federal judge had overstepped in directing the administration to provide a road map to Abrego Garcia’s return. “Neither the secretary of state nor the president could be compelled by anybody to forcibly retrieve a citizen of El Salvador from El Salvador who again is a member of MS-13,” he said.
Bukele followed suit, saying that returning Abrego Garcia would be akin to smuggling “a terrorist into the United States.” As the Salvadoran president talked, Trump, surrounded by Cabinet members who spoke in support of the president on cue, smiled in approval.
On Monday evening, more than an hour after the deadline ordered by a judge, the Justice Department submitted its daily update outlining what steps it had taken to return Abrego Garcia to the United States. It echoed many of the recalcitrant remarks that administration officials had made in the Oval Office.
Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., the top House Democrat, called on the courts to hold Trump administration officials in contempt.
“The Supreme Court and/or the federal district court actually needs to enforce its order,” Jeffries said on MSNBC, suggesting that contempt citations could be directed at the secretaries of state and homeland security, as well as their subordinates.
Abrego Garcia’s wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, said the U.S. and Salvadoran governments were playing “political games” with her husband’s life.
“My heart is heavy, but I hold on to hope and the strength of those around me,” she said.
Stephen Vladeck, a law professor at Georgetown University, said the idea that “the government can disappear people to a foreign country with no due process and no responsibility for what happens next” amounted to “a rule-of-law crisis.”
“If the government can do it to Abrego Garcia, they can do it to anybody,” Vladeck said.
In Bukele, Trump has found a partner in his efforts to force scores of migrants to a Salvadoran prison and keep them there with little regard for checks and balances.
The Supreme Court last week ordered the administration to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s return, but it never defined the specific steps that U.S. officials should take to carry out the plan. Bondi on Monday argued that the court ruling means the United States would need to help with Abrego Garcia’s return — such as by providing a plane — only if Bukele were to decide to send him back to the United States.
“The court gave the administration an opening and the administration has taken a millimeter-wide opening and driven a Mack truck through it,” Vladeck said.
Michael G. Kozak, the senior bureau official in the State Department’s Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs, said in a sworn statement Saturday that, based on information from the U.S. Embassy in San Salvador, Abrego Garcia is “alive and secure” in the prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT.
Trump and Bukele have paired their tough-on-crime personas with highly sensationalized public relations campaigns on social media.
After a surge of gang violence in El Salvador, Bukele imposed a state of emergency, which has yet to be lifted, and directed police and military forces to carry out mass arrests. Many of the 85,000 Salvadorans who were arrested disappeared into the prison system without trial and without their families knowing whether they were alive.
“The United States should be holding Bukele’s government accountable for these serious violations, but instead the Trump administration is cozying up to and copying Bukele’s authoritarian playbook — rounding up people with no evidence, denying them any due process and disappearing them in abusive Salvadoran prisons indefinitely,” said Amanda Strayer, the senior counsel for accountability at the advocacy group Human Rights First.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
© 2025 The New York Times Company
