U.S. takes aim at China’s production of essential computer chips

President Joe Biden discusses his administration’s economic initiatives at the Intel Ocotillo Campus in Chandler, Ariz., March 20, 2024. The Biden administration on Monday initiated a trade investigation into China’s production of older types of computer chips that are integral for cars, dishwashers, telecom networks and military weaponry. (Tom Brenner/The New York Times)

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration initiated a trade investigation Monday into China’s production of older types of computer chips that are integral for cars, dishwashers, telecom networks and military weaponry.

The inquiry could result in tariffs or other measures to block Chinese chips from entering U.S. markets, though the decision of which approach to take, if any, would fall to the incoming Trump administration.

ADVERTISING


In industry after industry — from steel and ships to solar panels and electric vehicles — China has pumped money into building world-class manufacturing facilities, creating a surge of low-cost products that ultimately flood global markets. U.S. companies, along with firms in many other countries, finding themselves unable to compete, have shut down, leaving Chinese firms largely in control of the global market.

U.S. officials have been worrying that the semiconductor industry could be next. Chinese companies have been ramping up their production of chips, particularly the older types of semiconductors that continue to power a wide array of machinery and appliances. China is building more new semiconductor factories than any other country, a development that U.S. officials argue threatens the viability of chip plants in Europe and the United States.

Katherine Tai, the U.S. trade representative, said in a call Sunday that China’s policies were enabling its companies to rapidly expand and to “offer artificially lower-priced chips that threaten to significantly harm, and potentially eliminate, their market-oriented competition.”

That results in supply chains that “are more vulnerable and subject to supply chain choke points that can be used to economically coerce other countries,” she said.

This type of investigation allows the U.S. government to take an array of actions to respond to discriminatory foreign government practices that burden U.S. commerce. It will be carried out by the Office of the United States Trade Representative under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. It typically takes between six months and a year for such an investigation to conclude, experts said.

Tensions between the United States and China have grown during the Biden administration, as the U.S. has clamped down on shipments of advanced technology to China out of national security concerns. China has fired back by restricting mineral exports that are used to make cars, semiconductors and weaponry.

In a statement, a spokesperson from China’s Ministry of Commerce said that China “strongly deplores and firmly opposes” the investigation, and that the country would “take all necessary measures to resolutely defend its rights and interests.”

The United States has provided huge subsidies to its own chips industry, and Chinese chip exports to the United States are far lower than its imports from the United States, the ministry said.

“This is obviously self-contradictory,” the statement said.

The Biden administration has issued a series of export controls in recent years to try to stifle China’s ability to make the most advanced computer chips, arguing that the technology could help Beijing develop new weapons and artificial intelligence to augment its military capabilities.

But the Biden administration has not done much to target China’s production of older types of chips, what are sometimes called “legacy chips.” The Chinese government and companies based in China have poured money into making these types of chips, which are still essential for modern economies and militaries.

China does not dominate global chip production yet, but its market share is growing fast. The U.S. government estimates that China could be responsible for more than 40% of global capacity in foundational chips by 2032, with more than half of the world’s capacity in some segments.

A memo written by the Commerce Department, which was sent to other government agencies in November and viewed by The New York Times, said China was on track to dominate the supply chain for legacy chips by 2030. That could present serious risks to U.S. national security, like eroding the U.S. industrial base, creating supply chain choke points and leading to potential cyber threats, the department said.

The memo also argued that China’s chip expansion posed a threat to new chip facilities the U.S. government was investing in. Using funding from the 2022 CHIPS law, the Commerce Department has been signing contracts to invest tens of billions of dollars in chipmaking facilities in the United States, including more than $4 billion for legacy chip production.

The Commerce Department memo said modeling by its CHIPS program office suggested that new Chinese capacity could mean factories in the United States and allied countries end up producing fewer chips than needed for them to remain economically viable.

“In the face of these trends, we’ve seen chip companies hesitate to invest in the U.S.,” Gina Raimondo, the secretary of commerce, said in the call Sunday.

According to a government survey, Chinese suppliers had been offering chips at prices 30% to 50% lower than those of U.S. suppliers, and in some cases lower than the cost of production, the memo said.

Matt Turpin, a former Trump administration official and a senior adviser at Palantir Technologies, said that China’s chip production threatened the revenues of U.S. companies, and therefore the multibillion-dollar investments that the U.S. government was making in new factories.

“That makes the entire CHIPS Act come unglued,” Turpin said.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.

© 2024 The New York Times Company

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Star-Advertiser's TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email hawaiiwarriorworld@staradvertiser.com.