Your Views for June 30

The ‘anti’ threat

The purpose of the Big Island Community Coalition is to work toward reduced electrical energy costs on the Island of Hawaii — where we pay up to four times the national average for our power. We particularly are sensitive to electric power rates as very high rates serve essentially as a regressive tax on our population while greatly reducing the probability of generating jobs in any sector dependent on electricity.

There are occasions when events are so alarming that groups such as ours feel compelled to move beyond our primary task.

This is such a time.

We have observed with increasing alarm as our community has taken steps that inexorably blunt the forward movement of our economy and even move us backwards. These include:

1. Anti-geothermal activists encouraged county government to ban nighttime drilling, effectively stopping expansion of a major source of renewable and inexpensive electric power beyond already-existing permits. This action was taken despite the existing plant meeting all applicable noise standards. It appears government officials took this action without first going to the site to verify that the noise was disruptive. Once they did go to the site, some years later, government found the noise was less than other environmental sounds (i.e., coqui frogs) and essentially no more than typical background noise.

2. Anti-GMO activists lobbied to stop any new GMO products from being grown on the island — despite the fact that the vast majority of scientific, peer-reviewed studies found such products to be as safe, and in some cases more nutritious, as their non-GMO counterparts. Legislation even prohibited GMO flowers — not consumed by anyone — from being grown on the island. Thus, family farmers lost the most effective new tools needed to reduce pesticide and herbicide usage while increasing productivity needed to keep their farms competitive.

3. Now, we have anti-Thirty Meter Telescope activists taking steps to stop construction of the most advanced telescope in the world. If successful in stopping TMT, despite its sponsors following every legal requirement through a seven-year period, we will lose our world-leading advantage in understanding the universe.

All of these actions share similar characteristics:

• The arguments used to justify such actions are consistently anti-scientific.

• “Anti” groups often obscure the lack of scientific evidence to support their position by using emotional pleas intended to incite fear.

• The only “win” for many of these groups is to completely stop, thereby making them completely unwilling to consider any facts that refute their position or to make any reasonable compromise.

• Long-term consequences are significant culturally and economically.

Cultures that survive and thrive embrace new technologies carefully, thoughtfully and steadily. Cultures and economies that thrive are innovative because they generate ideas and solutions, solve problems and take calculated but careful risks.

Cultures that fall backward are those that fear advancement, fear change and cling to a mythicized view of yesteryear. The net result is loss of their brightest and most hard-working youth. Those youth who remain find fewer and fewer jobs — those jobs having greatly diminished economic value and lower wages. The downward spiral becomes inexorable.

As we look to tomorrow, we need to ask ourselves whether we want to give our children the exciting and invigorating job market typified by Silicon Valley or a job market much closer to the poorer regions of third-world countries.

It is up to us to point one way or another. Driving TMT out will be one more major step to cultural and economic poverty.

Richard Ha, president, Big Island Community Coalition;

David DeLuz Jr., Rockne Freitas, Michelle Galimba, Wallace Ishibashi, Noe Kalipi, H.R “Monty” Richards, William Walter